Narrative:

On 240 degree vector, leveling at 5000 ft GPWS 'terrain' warning received. Executed terrain recovery procedures. Flaps 2 degree limit exceeded. Excessive noise in cockpit due to maximum power, heavy rain, altitude alerter and overspd horn. Unable to communicate effectively with captain or ATC due to noise level. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated the aircraft was at 200 KTS and descending fairly rapidly but starting to level so as to capture 5000 ft when the GPWS 'terrain' warning sounded. After the avoidance maneuver, the controller stated that the minimum vectoring altitude for that area was 5000 ft. I questioned whether the rate of descent feature of the GPWS could have been responsible for the warning. The reporter thought possibly. The terrain feature worked as advertised and the srs commands activated following toga thrust selection. The reporter stated that the crew filed a report with the company in the event the anomaly was an aircraft malfunction.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN A320 EXCEEDED THE FLAPS 2 DEG LIMIT AIRSPD DURING A GPWS 'TERRAIN' WARNING AVOIDANCE MANEUVER.

Narrative: ON 240 DEG VECTOR, LEVELING AT 5000 FT GPWS 'TERRAIN' WARNING RECEIVED. EXECUTED TERRAIN RECOVERY PROCS. FLAPS 2 DEG LIMIT EXCEEDED. EXCESSIVE NOISE IN COCKPIT DUE TO MAX PWR, HVY RAIN, ALT ALERTER AND OVERSPD HORN. UNABLE TO COMMUNICATE EFFECTIVELY WITH CAPT OR ATC DUE TO NOISE LEVEL. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THE ACFT WAS AT 200 KTS AND DSNDING FAIRLY RAPIDLY BUT STARTING TO LEVEL SO AS TO CAPTURE 5000 FT WHEN THE GPWS 'TERRAIN' WARNING SOUNDED. AFTER THE AVOIDANCE MANEUVER, THE CTLR STATED THAT THE MINIMUM VECTORING ALT FOR THAT AREA WAS 5000 FT. I QUESTIONED WHETHER THE RATE OF DSCNT FEATURE OF THE GPWS COULD HAVE BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WARNING. THE RPTR THOUGHT POSSIBLY. THE TERRAIN FEATURE WORKED AS ADVERTISED AND THE SRS COMMANDS ACTIVATED FOLLOWING TOGA THRUST SELECTION. THE RPTR STATED THAT THE CREW FILED A RPT WITH THE COMPANY IN THE EVENT THE ANOMALY WAS AN ACFT MALFUNCTION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.