A lear 60 flight crew fail to identify a crossing restr on the arrival chart resulting in a crossing...

Attributes
ACN	610211
Time
Date	200403
Day	Thu
Local Time Of Day	1201 To 1800
Place
Locale Reference	intersection : raddy
State Reference	WA
Altitude	msl single value : 21000
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Daylight
Aircraft 1
Controlling Facilities	artcc : zse.artcc
Operator	general aviation : corporate
Make Model Name	Learjet 60
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 91
Flight Phase	descent : intermediate altitude descent : approach
Route In Use	arrival star : chins
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : atp
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 110 flight time total : 6800 flight time type : 2700
ASRS Report	610211
Person 2
Affiliation	company : corporate
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Events
Anomaly	altitude deviation : crossing restriction not met altitude deviation : undershoot non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far
Independent Detector	other controllera
Resolutory Action	controller : issued advisory
Consequence	faa : reviewed incident with flight crew
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Chart Or Publication Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

On the STAR, 'CHINS5' into seattle boeing field, our STAR which is dated 'nov/fri/03,' had a crossing restr off 'humpp' intersection at 15000 ft for aircraft landing to the south, which is what the airport was doing at that time. It had a restr for 'raddy' intersection at 11000 ft for landing into the north. While crossing raddy at 21000 ft, the controller advised that the restr was for 'raddy' at 16000 ft and we were at 21000 ft. We advised him what our 'STAR,' dated 'nov/fri/03,' showed, which was 'humpp' at 15000 ft and no restr for 'raddy,' but 11000 ft for landing to the north! We were given a phone number to call the 'center' supervisor! He had a different crossing restr on the 'nos charts' they use. We checked our commercial revisions in the airplane and found no other updated charts.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A LEAR 60 FLT CREW FAIL TO IDENT A XING RESTR ON THE ARR CHART RESULTING IN A XING RESTR NOT BING MET.

Narrative: ON THE STAR, 'CHINS5' INTO SEATTLE BOEING FIELD, OUR STAR WHICH IS DATED 'NOV/FRI/03,' HAD A XING RESTR OFF 'HUMPP' INTXN AT 15000 FT FOR ACFT LNDG TO THE S, WHICH IS WHAT THE ARPT WAS DOING AT THAT TIME. IT HAD A RESTR FOR 'RADDY' INTXN AT 11000 FT FOR LNDG INTO THE N. WHILE XING RADDY AT 21000 FT, THE CTLR ADVISED THAT THE RESTR WAS FOR 'RADDY' AT 16000 FT AND WE WERE AT 21000 FT. WE ADVISED HIM WHAT OUR 'STAR,' DATED 'NOV/FRI/03,' SHOWED, WHICH WAS 'HUMPP' AT 15000 FT AND NO RESTR FOR 'RADDY,' BUT 11000 FT FOR LNDG TO THE N! WE WERE GIVEN A PHONE NUMBER TO CALL THE 'CTR' SUPVR! HE HAD A DIFFERENT XING RESTR ON THE 'NOS CHARTS' THEY USE. WE CHKED OUR COMMERCIAL REVISIONS IN THE AIRPLANE AND FOUND NO OTHER UPDATED CHARTS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.

A lear 60 flight crew fail to identify a crossing restr on the arrival chart resulting in a crossing restr not bing met.