Narrative:

Dec/fri/03, I was in command of flight from ZZZ to ZZZ1. I had the aircraft deiced at the gate for the flight to ZZZ1, type 4 deice fluid was applied to the aircraft. The first officer and I had a discussion about if MEL 29-77 was needed. I contacted ZZZ operations and asked them to contact ZZZ maintenance control about this issue. I also contacted ZZZ dispatch via ACARS and asked if MEL 29-77 was needed. The reply from dispatch was no MEL required, however I may have had a breakdown in communications with dispatch. A logbook entry had been made for deice with type 4 fluid then changed to (entered in error) based on dispatch's response. I do not recall if MEL 27-99 placard was installed. I did not hear back from maintenance control. The flight was made to ZZZ, nothing abnormal was noted.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE AFTER BEING DEICED WITH TYPE 4 FLUID BUT NOT PLACARDED FOR THE SPD RESTR PER THE AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE.

Narrative: DEC/FRI/03, I WAS IN COMMAND OF FLT FROM ZZZ TO ZZZ1. I HAD THE ACFT DEICED AT THE GATE FOR THE FLT TO ZZZ1, TYPE 4 DEICE FLUID WAS APPLIED TO THE ACFT. THE FO AND I HAD A DISCUSSION ABOUT IF MEL 29-77 WAS NEEDED. I CONTACTED ZZZ OPS AND ASKED THEM TO CONTACT ZZZ MAINT CTL ABOUT THIS ISSUE. I ALSO CONTACTED ZZZ DISPATCH VIA ACARS AND ASKED IF MEL 29-77 WAS NEEDED. THE REPLY FROM DISPATCH WAS NO MEL REQUIRED, HOWEVER I MAY HAVE HAD A BREAKDOWN IN COMS WITH DISPATCH. A LOGBOOK ENTRY HAD BEEN MADE FOR DEICE WITH TYPE 4 FLUID THEN CHANGED TO (ENTERED IN ERROR) BASED ON DISPATCH'S RESPONSE. I DO NOT RECALL IF MEL 27-99 PLACARD WAS INSTALLED. I DID NOT HEAR BACK FROM MAINT CTL. THE FLT WAS MADE TO ZZZ, NOTHING ABNORMAL WAS NOTED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.