![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 565965 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 200210 | 
| Day | Wed | 
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : 2s1.airport | 
| State Reference | WA | 
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Daylight | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | general aviation : personal | 
| Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | ground : taxi | 
| Flight Plan | None | 
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | other | 
| Function | flight crew : single pilot | 
| Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument  | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 2600 flight time type : 2400  | 
| ASRS Report | 565965 | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other  | 
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa | 
| Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted | 
| Consequence | other other  | 
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance  | 
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation | 
Narrative:
I taxied my airplane into a hole on a grass taxiway and caused a minor propeller strike. There was no loss of RPM and I did not realize that the propeller had impacted the sod. I flew from vashon to renton airport (about 20 NM) and then back to vashon, still without realizing the strike had occurred. When I did the preflight prior to leaving vashon the second time, I discovered grass stains and nicks on the propeller tips. I then flew the airplane from vashon to tacoma (tiw) to have the propeller checked by a mechanic. He had the propeller repaired and performed the required airworthiness directive. Upon reflection, I feel that I should not have flown the airplane without having it first inspected by a mechanic. Perhaps more information could be made available about the potential seriousness of a propeller strike. I think that there are at least 2 human performance considerations: 1) failure to complete a thorough preflight when leaving renton, after the first flight leg, and 2) lack of knowledge about the serious nature of even a minor propeller strike.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 PLT HAD THE PROP STRIKE THE GND WHEN HE TAXIED INTO A HOLE ON THE GRASS TXWY. THE PLT THEN FLEW HOME AFTER DETECTING THE DAMAGE.
Narrative: I TAXIED MY AIRPLANE INTO A HOLE ON A GRASS TXWY AND CAUSED A MINOR PROP STRIKE. THERE WAS NO LOSS OF RPM AND I DID NOT REALIZE THAT THE PROP HAD IMPACTED THE SOD. I FLEW FROM VASHON TO RENTON ARPT (ABOUT 20 NM) AND THEN BACK TO VASHON, STILL WITHOUT REALIZING THE STRIKE HAD OCCURRED. WHEN I DID THE PREFLT PRIOR TO LEAVING VASHON THE SECOND TIME, I DISCOVERED GRASS STAINS AND NICKS ON THE PROP TIPS. I THEN FLEW THE AIRPLANE FROM VASHON TO TACOMA (TIW) TO HAVE THE PROP CHKED BY A MECH. HE HAD THE PROP REPAIRED AND PERFORMED THE REQUIRED AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE. UPON REFLECTION, I FEEL THAT I SHOULD NOT HAVE FLOWN THE AIRPLANE WITHOUT HAVING IT FIRST INSPECTED BY A MECH. PERHAPS MORE INFO COULD BE MADE AVAILABLE ABOUT THE POTENTIAL SERIOUSNESS OF A PROP STRIKE. I THINK THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST 2 HUMAN PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS: 1) FAILURE TO COMPLETE A THOROUGH PREFLT WHEN LEAVING RENTON, AFTER THE FIRST FLT LEG, AND 2) LACK OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE SERIOUS NATURE OF EVEN A MINOR PROP STRIKE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.