![]()  | 
            37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System  | 
            
                
  | 
        
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 563086 | 
| Time | |
| Date | 200210 | 
| Day | Thu | 
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 | 
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : lemd.airport | 
| State Reference | KY | 
| Altitude | msl single value : 4500 | 
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC | 
| Light | Night | 
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : lex.tower | 
| Operator | general aviation : personal | 
| Make Model Name | Baron 55/Cochise | 
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 | 
| Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude | 
| Flight Plan | IFR | 
| Person 1 | |
| Function | observation : passenger | 
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine  | 
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 60 flight time total : 1450 flight time type : 15  | 
| ASRS Report | 563086 | 
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | other | 
| Function | flight crew : single pilot | 
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other  | 
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb  | 
| Resolutory Action | aircraft : equipment problem dissipated other  | 
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew | 
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance  | 
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance | 
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation | 
Narrative:
We departed lex on an IFR flight plan to ump. Climbed to 7000 ft on the runway heading (220 degrees). Just after gear retraction, we suffered a total electrical failure. We continued the climb on the runway heading while trying to sort out the problem. We leveled at 4500 ft in VMC while working the problem. I recommended we return to lex. The owner of the aircraft (a cfii-mei, who I was splitting time with) wanted to continue to ump. I again recommended a return to lex. He advised that he had a GPS (handheld) and would get us a heading. I turned the aircraft to an approximately heading for ump. After a few more mins, we were far enough away from lex that, not being familiar with the area, I was concerned about finding lex again -- at least we were heading for familiar territory. Upon arrival in the ump area, we manually extended the gear. We turned on the master just to see if we would get a green light to confirm the gear down and all of a sudden everything came back on! The other pilot contacted ind approach to cancel our IFR. The controller gave him a number to call when we landed. We landed normally and that ended the incident. The problem was caused by a completely mechanical issue. I believe that although I was not PIC, we probably should have returned to lex. As it was, the ceiling and visibility were very good so I saw nothing unsafe about continuing to the destination.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BE55 PLT AND PLT PAX HAD A COMPLETE ELECTRICAL FAILURE ON A NIGHT DEP.
Narrative: WE DEPARTED LEX ON AN IFR FLT PLAN TO UMP. CLBED TO 7000 FT ON THE RWY HDG (220 DEGS). JUST AFTER GEAR RETRACTION, WE SUFFERED A TOTAL ELECTRICAL FAILURE. WE CONTINUED THE CLB ON THE RWY HDG WHILE TRYING TO SORT OUT THE PROB. WE LEVELED AT 4500 FT IN VMC WHILE WORKING THE PROB. I RECOMMENDED WE RETURN TO LEX. THE OWNER OF THE ACFT (A CFII-MEI, WHO I WAS SPLITTING TIME WITH) WANTED TO CONTINUE TO UMP. I AGAIN RECOMMENDED A RETURN TO LEX. HE ADVISED THAT HE HAD A GPS (HANDHELD) AND WOULD GET US A HDG. I TURNED THE ACFT TO AN APPROX HDG FOR UMP. AFTER A FEW MORE MINS, WE WERE FAR ENOUGH AWAY FROM LEX THAT, NOT BEING FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA, I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT FINDING LEX AGAIN -- AT LEAST WE WERE HEADING FOR FAMILIAR TERRITORY. UPON ARR IN THE UMP AREA, WE MANUALLY EXTENDED THE GEAR. WE TURNED ON THE MASTER JUST TO SEE IF WE WOULD GET A GREEN LIGHT TO CONFIRM THE GEAR DOWN AND ALL OF A SUDDEN EVERYTHING CAME BACK ON! THE OTHER PLT CONTACTED IND APCH TO CANCEL OUR IFR. THE CTLR GAVE HIM A NUMBER TO CALL WHEN WE LANDED. WE LANDED NORMALLY AND THAT ENDED THE INCIDENT. THE PROB WAS CAUSED BY A COMPLETELY MECHANICAL ISSUE. I BELIEVE THAT ALTHOUGH I WAS NOT PIC, WE PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE RETURNED TO LEX. AS IT WAS, THE CEILING AND VISIBILITY WERE VERY GOOD SO I SAW NOTHING UNSAFE ABOUT CONTINUING TO THE DEST.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.