Narrative:

Inbound to duj, severe WX protruded north of the field with intense lighting. On a vector for an ILS, on the downwind leg, first officer reported the airport in sight. Center replied 'roger, cleared for the visual approach.' we then proceeded inbound and landed. I assumed being cleared for an approach meant all requirements were met for that approach. Upon further investigation, I found that ATC is not responsible for determining what type of approach can be flown, or if it is the proper approach for the WX. We did not request a visual approach and do not recall what the WX was at the time of the approach because our concentration was on WX. The visibility was variable, up and down, and we were 5-8 mi out when the field was in sight.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: BE1900 FLC CONCERNED WITH VISUAL APCH BEING ISSUED AFTER RPTING FIELD IN SIGHT.

Narrative: INBOUND TO DUJ, SEVERE WX PROTRUDED N OF THE FIELD WITH INTENSE LIGHTING. ON A VECTOR FOR AN ILS, ON THE DOWNWIND LEG, FO RPTED THE ARPT IN SIGHT. CTR REPLIED 'ROGER, CLRED FOR THE VISUAL APCH.' WE THEN PROCEEDED INBOUND AND LANDED. I ASSUMED BEING CLRED FOR AN APCH MEANT ALL REQUIREMENTS WERE MET FOR THAT APCH. UPON FURTHER INVESTIGATION, I FOUND THAT ATC IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING WHAT TYPE OF APCH CAN BE FLOWN, OR IF IT IS THE PROPER APCH FOR THE WX. WE DID NOT REQUEST A VISUAL APCH AND DO NOT RECALL WHAT THE WX WAS AT THE TIME OF THE APCH BECAUSE OUR CONCENTRATION WAS ON WX. THE VISIBILITY WAS VARIABLE, UP AND DOWN, AND WE WERE 5-8 MI OUT WHEN THE FIELD WAS IN SIGHT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.