![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 552396 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200207 |
| Day | Tue |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : tka.airport |
| State Reference | AK |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 200 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
| Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : roll |
| Flight Plan | None |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | ground : holding |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 2000 |
| ASRS Report | 552396 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : ground critical incursion : runway non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action flight crew : executed go around none taken : detected after the fact |
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 200 |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance Airport |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
Unintentionally contacted runway during aborted landing due to aircraft stopped on active runway. Cleared aircraft on runway by safe margin, then side-stepped to right and returned to land without incident. Problem due to my not maintaining sufficient spacing to allow for aircraft stopping on runway in use. I perceived that the blocking aircraft was moving (doing a touch-and-go) when, in fact, it was stationary. I delayed the decision to abort the landing too long. I was not aware of the intentions of the blocking aircraft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: POTENTIAL GND CONFLICT WHEN SMA X LANDS ON AN OCCUPIED RWY, BELIEVING THAT ACFT Y WAS ON A TOUCH-AND-GO, NOT STOPPED, AT TKA, AK.
Narrative: UNINTENTIONALLY CONTACTED RWY DURING ABORTED LNDG DUE TO ACFT STOPPED ON ACTIVE RWY. CLRED ACFT ON RWY BY SAFE MARGIN, THEN SIDE-STEPPED TO R AND RETURNED TO LAND WITHOUT INCIDENT. PROB DUE TO MY NOT MAINTAINING SUFFICIENT SPACING TO ALLOW FOR ACFT STOPPING ON RWY IN USE. I PERCEIVED THAT THE BLOCKING ACFT WAS MOVING (DOING A TOUCH-AND-GO) WHEN, IN FACT, IT WAS STATIONARY. I DELAYED THE DECISION TO ABORT THE LNDG TOO LONG. I WAS NOT AWARE OF THE INTENTIONS OF THE BLOCKING ACFT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.