Narrative:

Aircraft just released from contract maintenance. Walkaround did not reveal any defects. Once reaching cruise altitude, I noticed 'a' hydraulic system quantity at 1/4 full. Aircraft seemed normal, with no other indications. Talked with maintenance controller and dispatch and concluded it may be an error in the gauge. Reviewed proper checklist and continued to ord. After a non eventual landing and taxi to the gate, ord mechanic told us that the aircraft's wheel well and aft fuselage was a mess with hydraulic fluid. Our checklist for 'a' system quantity low says nothing about secondary indications, ie, hydraulic overtemp or hydraulic pressure low light. We had normal 'a' system pressure and no overtemp indications, as you would think you would have with a true low hydraulic quantity.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737-300 CREW HAD LOW 'A' SYS HYD FLUID QUANTITY INDICATION.

Narrative: ACFT JUST RELEASED FROM CONTRACT MAINT. WALKAROUND DID NOT REVEAL ANY DEFECTS. ONCE REACHING CRUISE ALT, I NOTICED 'A' HYD SYS QUANTITY AT 1/4 FULL. ACFT SEEMED NORMAL, WITH NO OTHER INDICATIONS. TALKED WITH MAINT CTLR AND DISPATCH AND CONCLUDED IT MAY BE AN ERROR IN THE GAUGE. REVIEWED PROPER CHKLIST AND CONTINUED TO ORD. AFTER A NON EVENTUAL LNDG AND TAXI TO THE GATE, ORD MECH TOLD US THAT THE ACFT'S WHEEL WELL AND AFT FUSELAGE WAS A MESS WITH HYD FLUID. OUR CHKLIST FOR 'A' SYS QUANTITY LOW SAYS NOTHING ABOUT SECONDARY INDICATIONS, IE, HYD OVERTEMP OR HYD PRESSURE LOW LIGHT. WE HAD NORMAL 'A' SYS PRESSURE AND NO OVERTEMP INDICATIONS, AS YOU WOULD THINK YOU WOULD HAVE WITH A TRUE LOW HYD QUANTITY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.