Narrative:

I was flying procedure instrument approach GPS 26 to dxr (with check pilot). I reported procedure turn inbound to iddey, when I had not been turned over to tower. I reported akobe (5 mi from map). In both incidences approach acknowledged, but did not send me to tower. At akobe approach was a different voice. I reported again, very close to runway and he finally sent me to tower, who told me to go around and land runway 26. I initiated go around, and saw a plane ahead and below me departing runway 26. At the same moment tower instructed an immediate left turn, which I did. Approach controller should not change shifts without completing procedures of aircraft in close to airport. I should have ignored approach's failure to transfer me and I should have called tower on my own initiative as I came close to airport.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN M20 PLT, WHILE FLYING A PRACTICE GPS APCH TO DXR, WAS TOLD TO GAR DUE TO TFC ON FINAL.

Narrative: I WAS FLYING PROC INSTRUMENT APCH GPS 26 TO DXR (WITH CHK PLT). I RPTED PROC TURN INBOUND TO IDDEY, WHEN I HAD NOT BEEN TURNED OVER TO TWR. I RPTED AKOBE (5 MI FROM MAP). IN BOTH INCIDENCES APCH ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT DID NOT SEND ME TO TWR. AT AKOBE APCH WAS A DIFFERENT VOICE. I RPTED AGAIN, VERY CLOSE TO RWY AND HE FINALLY SENT ME TO TWR, WHO TOLD ME TO GAR AND LAND RWY 26. I INITIATED GAR, AND SAW A PLANE AHEAD AND BELOW ME DEPARTING RWY 26. AT THE SAME MOMENT TWR INSTRUCTED AN IMMEDIATE L TURN, WHICH I DID. APCH CTLR SHOULD NOT CHANGE SHIFTS WITHOUT COMPLETING PROCS OF ACFT IN CLOSE TO ARPT. I SHOULD HAVE IGNORED APCH'S FAILURE TO TRANSFER ME AND I SHOULD HAVE CALLED TWR ON MY OWN INITIATIVE AS I CAME CLOSE TO ARPT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.