![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 529040 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200111 |
| Day | Sun |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : laf.airport |
| State Reference | IN |
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | landing : roll |
| Flight Plan | None |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | other |
| Function | flight crew : single pilot |
| Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 12 flight time total : 370 flight time type : 220 |
| ASRS Report | 529040 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | government : faa |
| Function | controller : local |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | incursion : taxiway non adherence : clearance non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew faa : investigated |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Problem landing on taxiway for 5-23 runways at laf. Cleared by tower for landing on runway 5. Misguided plane to taxiway for runway 5 and landed. My country landing strip that I normally use is 35 ft by 21000 ft. When confronted with the asphalt taxiway (probably 3000 ft long) it looked perfect for landing. I overlooked runway 5 and landed on the taxiway. (It looked like the best thing I had seen for awhile.) I saw no traffic conflicts, fortunately, but was asked to call the tower. That's when I learned what I had done wrong. (Controller did say I did a nice job keeping plane centered.) anyway she said she would send in a report. All I can suggest is that in the future, I'd better be looking for a runway number marking. That is a giveaway and I will pay attention in future.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A C172 PLT LANDED ON THE TXWY INSTEAD OF ON THE RWY.
Narrative: PROB LNDG ON TXWY FOR 5-23 RWYS AT LAF. CLRED BY TWR FOR LANDING ON RWY 5. MISGUIDED PLANE TO TXWY FOR RWY 5 AND LANDED. MY COUNTRY LNDG STRIP THAT I NORMALLY USE IS 35 FT BY 21000 FT. WHEN CONFRONTED WITH THE ASPHALT TXWY (PROBABLY 3000 FT LONG) IT LOOKED PERFECT FOR LANDING. I OVERLOOKED RWY 5 AND LANDED ON THE TXWY. (IT LOOKED LIKE THE BEST THING I HAD SEEN FOR AWHILE.) I SAW NO TFC CONFLICTS, FORTUNATELY, BUT WAS ASKED TO CALL THE TWR. THAT'S WHEN I LEARNED WHAT I HAD DONE WRONG. (CTLR DID SAY I DID A NICE JOB KEEPING PLANE CENTERED.) ANYWAY SHE SAID SHE WOULD SEND IN A RPT. ALL I CAN SUGGEST IS THAT IN THE FUTURE, I'D BETTER BE LOOKING FOR A RWY NUMBER MARKING. THAT IS A GIVEAWAY AND I WILL PAY ATTENTION IN FUTURE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.