Narrative:

Aircraft had a #1 engine egt exceedance. The item was deferred for a borescope within 10 cycles. I was informed by maintenance control that borescope was not required according to engineering and cleared the item. The maintenance controller informed me to clear the item -- that it fell into the 'B' group and engineering was informed and decided that a borescope was not needed. Maintenance manual 72-00-00-6 paragraph C states otherwise. Problem was detected after paperwork review and questioning of engineering.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-300 WAS RELEASED FOR SVC IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH A REQUIRED INSPECTION ITEM FOR AN ENG OVERTEMP LIMIT NOT ACCOMPLISHED.

Narrative: ACFT HAD A #1 ENG EGT EXCEEDANCE. THE ITEM WAS DEFERRED FOR A BORESCOPE WITHIN 10 CYCLES. I WAS INFORMED BY MAINT CTL THAT BORESCOPE WAS NOT REQUIRED ACCORDING TO ENGINEERING AND CLRED THE ITEM. THE MAINT CTLR INFORMED ME TO CLR THE ITEM -- THAT IT FELL INTO THE 'B' GROUP AND ENGINEERING WAS INFORMED AND DECIDED THAT A BORESCOPE WAS NOT NEEDED. MAINT MANUAL 72-00-00-6 PARAGRAPH C STATES OTHERWISE. PROB WAS DETECTED AFTER PAPERWORK REVIEW AND QUESTIONING OF ENGINEERING.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.