 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A CL65 captain became distraction and did not notice his first officer did not remain on runway heading, as required, during departure from cvg.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 518160 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200107 |
| Day | Thu |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : cvg.airport |
| State Reference | OH |
| Altitude | msl single value : 1500 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65, Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
| Route In Use | departure sid : cincinnati 8 |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : commercial |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 40 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 4000 |
| ASRS Report | 518160 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather non adherence : far non adherence : clearance non adherence : company policies non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
First officer was flying the cincinnati 8 departure which calls for runway heading or as assigned. I was involved in running takeoff and departure/climb checklist and setting radios for the arrival into dayton. The in-flight time was blocked at 15 mins and workload was very high. First officer turned aircraft to a heading of 005 degrees without my noticing. Received a call from departure controller asking what our heading was. When I replied 005 degrees, he told us to turn to a heading of 274 degrees (runway heading). No conflict was mentioned and no traffic avoidance was required. Contributing factors were high workload and a weak takeoff briefing with assumptions that both of us knew what the departure procedure required. I reinstructed the first officer on departure briefings and made a note to myself to remain more vigilant in spite of the workload.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CL65 CAPT BECAME DISTR AND DID NOT NOTICE HIS FO DID NOT REMAIN ON RWY HDG, AS REQUIRED, DURING DEP FROM CVG.
Narrative: FO WAS FLYING THE CINCINNATI 8 DEP WHICH CALLS FOR RWY HDG OR AS ASSIGNED. I WAS INVOLVED IN RUNNING TKOF AND DEP/CLB CHKLIST AND SETTING RADIOS FOR THE ARR INTO DAYTON. THE INFLT TIME WAS BLOCKED AT 15 MINS AND WORKLOAD WAS VERY HIGH. FO TURNED ACFT TO A HDG OF 005 DEGS WITHOUT MY NOTICING. RECEIVED A CALL FROM DEP CTLR ASKING WHAT OUR HDG WAS. WHEN I REPLIED 005 DEGS, HE TOLD US TO TURN TO A HDG OF 274 DEGS (RWY HDG). NO CONFLICT WAS MENTIONED AND NO TFC AVOIDANCE WAS REQUIRED. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE HIGH WORKLOAD AND A WEAK TKOF BRIEFING WITH ASSUMPTIONS THAT BOTH OF US KNEW WHAT THE DEP PROC REQUIRED. I REINSTRUCTED THE FO ON DEP BRIEFINGS AND MADE A NOTE TO MYSELF TO REMAIN MORE VIGILANT IN SPITE OF THE WORKLOAD.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.