![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 514430 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200106 |
| Day | Tue |
| Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : orl.airport |
| State Reference | FL |
| Altitude | msl bound lower : 2000 msl bound upper : 2500 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | B737-200 |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach |
| Route In Use | approach : visual |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 250 flight time total : 4000 flight time type : 1000 |
| ASRS Report | 514430 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | altitude deviation : overshoot non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance |
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : returned to assigned altitude |
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
The event occurred during an en route descent into orlando IAP from the north, while on a vector to runway 18R. I (PF) was offered and accepted a visual to runway 18L with a restr to remain at or above 2500 ft MSL until south of the mco VOR. I was already descending out of 6000 ft for 3000 ft while configuring for landing when I accepted the visual. As I was in the turn for runway 18L, the captain (PNF) stated we were still north of the VOR. I noticed that we were passing through 2300 ft MSL so I arrested the descent at 2000 ft and started a climb back to 2500 ft MSL. Orlando tower asked us to confirm our altitude and advised us of the 2500 ft restr. I should have never accepted the visual with the 2500 ft restr. It requires a gradient of 4.4 degrees to make a landing on runway 18L. Since I was well above 2500 ft when I accepted the visual, I felt much higher than usual and concentrated on losing altitude to make a normal approach with a 3.0 degree gradient. However, I should have been concentrating on the 2500 ft restr.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 FLT CREW HAS ALTDEV DURING THE FINAL APCH TO MCO.
Narrative: THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING AN ENRTE DSCNT INTO ORLANDO IAP FROM THE N, WHILE ON A VECTOR TO RWY 18R. I (PF) WAS OFFERED AND ACCEPTED A VISUAL TO RWY 18L WITH A RESTR TO REMAIN AT OR ABOVE 2500 FT MSL UNTIL S OF THE MCO VOR. I WAS ALREADY DSNDING OUT OF 6000 FT FOR 3000 FT WHILE CONFIGURING FOR LNDG WHEN I ACCEPTED THE VISUAL. AS I WAS IN THE TURN FOR RWY 18L, THE CAPT (PNF) STATED WE WERE STILL N OF THE VOR. I NOTICED THAT WE WERE PASSING THROUGH 2300 FT MSL SO I ARRESTED THE DSCNT AT 2000 FT AND STARTED A CLB BACK TO 2500 FT MSL. ORLANDO TWR ASKED US TO CONFIRM OUR ALT AND ADVISED US OF THE 2500 FT RESTR. I SHOULD HAVE NEVER ACCEPTED THE VISUAL WITH THE 2500 FT RESTR. IT REQUIRES A GRADIENT OF 4.4 DEGS TO MAKE A LNDG ON RWY 18L. SINCE I WAS WELL ABOVE 2500 FT WHEN I ACCEPTED THE VISUAL, I FELT MUCH HIGHER THAN USUAL AND CONCENTRATED ON LOSING ALT TO MAKE A NORMAL APCH WITH A 3.0 DEG GRADIENT. HOWEVER, I SHOULD HAVE BEEN CONCENTRATING ON THE 2500 FT RESTR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.