 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A CL65 PIC realizes his approach chart for the assigned ILS runway 6R is not current, 60 mi southeast of yyz, on.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 504880 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200103 |
| Day | Sat |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| State Reference | ON |
| Altitude | msl single value : 15000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | IMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : cyyz.tracon |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65, Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Navigation In Use | other other vortac |
| Flight Phase | descent : vacating altitude |
| Route In Use | approach : instrument precision arrival : profile descent arrival star : n/s |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 6700 flight time type : 2500 |
| ASRS Report | 504880 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | non adherence : company policies other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | other |
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Chart Or Publication |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
During the profile descent into toronto, ATC told us to expect ILS runway 6R. After looking through my approach charts, I realized I did not have ILS runway 6R. I recently updated all my charts, however, I soon realized the revision did not become effective until mar/xa/01. Fortunately, my first officer still had a copy of ILS runway 6R and his charts from his last revision. However, we both decided to do the ILS runway 5 since we both had current charts and informed ATC of our situation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CL65 PIC REALIZES HIS APCH CHART FOR THE ASSIGNED ILS RWY 6R IS NOT CURRENT, 60 MI SE OF YYZ, ON.
Narrative: DURING THE PROFILE DSCNT INTO TORONTO, ATC TOLD US TO EXPECT ILS RWY 6R. AFTER LOOKING THROUGH MY APCH CHARTS, I REALIZED I DID NOT HAVE ILS RWY 6R. I RECENTLY UPDATED ALL MY CHARTS, HOWEVER, I SOON REALIZED THE REVISION DID NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE UNTIL MAR/XA/01. FORTUNATELY, MY FO STILL HAD A COPY OF ILS RWY 6R AND HIS CHARTS FROM HIS LAST REVISION. HOWEVER, WE BOTH DECIDED TO DO THE ILS RWY 5 SINCE WE BOTH HAD CURRENT CHARTS AND INFORMED ATC OF OUR SIT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.