Narrative:

ATC vectored us high and close to the psp airport for a visual to runway 13R. When cleared for the visual, I turned east to allow room for the descent and the turn back to downwind. Wbound VFR traffic was called by ATC and appeared on TCASII. Visual contact was made. Passing this traffic, a 'reduce descent' RA was generated and followed. No other traffic was observed on the TCASII or called by ATC. I turned right to enter the downwind for runway 13R. During the turn a TCASII target appeared moving toward us. This target closed on us and again a 'reduce descent' RA was generated and followed. Visual contact with this 'second' target was never made nor did ATC ever call it. Once 'clear of conflict' the landing was made without further incident. Note: given the fact that there were never 2 TCASII targets ever present and ATC never advised of additional traffic and visual contact was never made with the second target, is it possible that it was in fact a 'false' target return from the traffic we had already passed caused by the TCASII antenna tilt/orientation change during our turn (25-30 degree bank)?

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN MD83 FLC GETS 2 TCASII RA'S OFF 1 ACFT WHILE CIRCLING E OF PSP, CA.

Narrative: ATC VECTORED US HIGH AND CLOSE TO THE PSP ARPT FOR A VISUAL TO RWY 13R. WHEN CLRED FOR THE VISUAL, I TURNED E TO ALLOW ROOM FOR THE DSCNT AND THE TURN BACK TO DOWNWIND. WBOUND VFR TFC WAS CALLED BY ATC AND APPEARED ON TCASII. VISUAL CONTACT WAS MADE. PASSING THIS TFC, A 'REDUCE DSCNT' RA WAS GENERATED AND FOLLOWED. NO OTHER TFC WAS OBSERVED ON THE TCASII OR CALLED BY ATC. I TURNED R TO ENTER THE DOWNWIND FOR RWY 13R. DURING THE TURN A TCASII TARGET APPEARED MOVING TOWARD US. THIS TARGET CLOSED ON US AND AGAIN A 'REDUCE DSCNT' RA WAS GENERATED AND FOLLOWED. VISUAL CONTACT WITH THIS 'SECOND' TARGET WAS NEVER MADE NOR DID ATC EVER CALL IT. ONCE 'CLR OF CONFLICT' THE LNDG WAS MADE WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. NOTE: GIVEN THE FACT THAT THERE WERE NEVER 2 TCASII TARGETS EVER PRESENT AND ATC NEVER ADVISED OF ADDITIONAL TFC AND VISUAL CONTACT WAS NEVER MADE WITH THE SECOND TARGET, IS IT POSSIBLE THAT IT WAS IN FACT A 'FALSE' TARGET RETURN FROM THE TFC WE HAD ALREADY PASSED CAUSED BY THE TCASII ANTENNA TILT/ORIENTATION CHANGE DURING OUR TURN (25-30 DEG BANK)?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.