 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
The flight crew of a cpr king air departed a non tower airport on an IFR flight plan without calling ind departure control at ump, in.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 496140 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200012 |
| Day | Wed |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : ump.airport |
| State Reference | IN |
| Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 1500 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Dusk |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : ind.tracon |
| Operator | general aviation : corporate |
| Make Model Name | Super King Air 350 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | climbout : initial climbout : takeoff ground : position and hold ground : takeoff roll ground : taxi |
| Route In Use | departure : other published ifr departure |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : corporate |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : multi engine |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 90 flight time total : 11600 flight time type : 120 |
| ASRS Report | 496140 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : corporate |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | airspace violation : entry non adherence : far non adherence : clearance other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other controllera |
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Passenger Human Performance Airport |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
We received an IFR clearance from ind departure control on a flight from ump (indianapolis metropolitan) to asw (warsaw, in). They did not issue a hold, but they requested that we report #1 for takeoff on runway 33. I had to talk with a passenger and when I got back on the radio my first officer said things were fine to go. When we contacted departure, they mentioned to us to contact them prior to our takeoff. I do not believe there was a traffic conflict. This could have been avoided by no conversation with passenger.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: THE FLC OF A CPR KING AIR DEPARTED A NON TWR ARPT ON AN IFR FLT PLAN WITHOUT CALLING IND DEP CTL AT UMP, IN.
Narrative: WE RECEIVED AN IFR CLRNC FROM IND DEP CTL ON A FLT FROM UMP (INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN) TO ASW (WARSAW, IN). THEY DID NOT ISSUE A HOLD, BUT THEY REQUESTED THAT WE RPT #1 FOR TKOF ON RWY 33. I HAD TO TALK WITH A PAX AND WHEN I GOT BACK ON THE RADIO MY FO SAID THINGS WERE FINE TO GO. WHEN WE CONTACTED DEP, THEY MENTIONED TO US TO CONTACT THEM PRIOR TO OUR TKOF. I DO NOT BELIEVE THERE WAS A TFC CONFLICT. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED BY NO CONVERSATION WITH PAX.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.