![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 492790 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200011 |
| Day | Tue |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : lga.airport |
| State Reference | NY |
| Altitude | agl single value : 50 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : lga.tower |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | A320 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 22 |
| Flight Phase | landing : roll |
| Route In Use | approach : visual |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 60 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 600 |
| ASRS Report | 492790 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather inflight encounter other non adherence : company policies other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted none taken : detected after the fact |
| Consequence | Other |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Weather |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
Aircraft landing on runway 22 lga. Doing RNAV runway 22 approach then cleared for the visual. Had ILS on secondary flight plan tuned in, so I used that for guidance. We had gusty xwinds and I suspected possible local windshear conditions, therefore used flaps 3 degrees for landing according to procedure. Approach and landing was normal, on speed and not a hard landing, and no indication of windshear. After making a normal landing aircraft skipped back in the air and again made a normal landing. Upon landing there was a windshear indication on pfd, but no aural warning. At the gate a 1 inch square was found on the bottom of the aft drain mast, no other damage to aircraft. At this time I have no idea why the aircraft skipped. I can only think of 2 possibilities. Either the aircraft started to sink because of windshear and I rotated to stop the sink, but I don't think so because everything seemed normal to me, or the spoilers did not deploy because it detected windshear. At this time I have no idea what I could have done differently to change the outcome.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DRAIN MAST DAMAGE DISCOVERED AT RAMP.
Narrative: ACFT LNDG ON RWY 22 LGA. DOING RNAV RWY 22 APCH THEN CLRED FOR THE VISUAL. HAD ILS ON SECONDARY FLT PLAN TUNED IN, SO I USED THAT FOR GUIDANCE. WE HAD GUSTY XWINDS AND I SUSPECTED POSSIBLE LCL WINDSHEAR CONDITIONS, THEREFORE USED FLAPS 3 DEGS FOR LNDG ACCORDING TO PROC. APCH AND LNDG WAS NORMAL, ON SPD AND NOT A HARD LNDG, AND NO INDICATION OF WINDSHEAR. AFTER MAKING A NORMAL LNDG ACFT SKIPPED BACK IN THE AIR AND AGAIN MADE A NORMAL LNDG. UPON LNDG THERE WAS A WINDSHEAR INDICATION ON PFD, BUT NO AURAL WARNING. AT THE GATE A 1 INCH SQUARE WAS FOUND ON THE BOTTOM OF THE AFT DRAIN MAST, NO OTHER DAMAGE TO ACFT. AT THIS TIME I HAVE NO IDEA WHY THE ACFT SKIPPED. I CAN ONLY THINK OF 2 POSSIBILITIES. EITHER THE ACFT STARTED TO SINK BECAUSE OF WINDSHEAR AND I ROTATED TO STOP THE SINK, BUT I DON'T THINK SO BECAUSE EVERYTHING SEEMED NORMAL TO ME, OR THE SPOILERS DID NOT DEPLOY BECAUSE IT DETECTED WINDSHEAR. AT THIS TIME I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I COULD HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY TO CHANGE THE OUTCOME.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.