Narrative:

I was following a heavy to runway 25L. ATC continually asking if I had the heavy in sight. 'No' I replied. Brasilia was to follow on runway 25R not to pass me. I was assigned 160 KTS, brasilia turned in on me and I saw him at 1:30 O'clock position, parallel at same time of RA and ATC's decision to turn me to 140 degrees heading left. Problem: 1) trying to always cram more aircraft into smaller areas, 2) ATC assuming for their planning that we will always except a visual. Thus ATC is not ready and will for any other reply like, 'no contact.' brasilia did not maintain separation, as instructed by ATC. When I advised ATC of our descent for an RA, his response was, 'ya, no problem, that is just the brasilia at 1 O'clock position.' sorry, TCASII RA's take into account the brasilia and any other aircraft close, and take precedent over ATC.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A320 CREW HAD TCASII RA IN LAX CLASS B.

Narrative: I WAS FOLLOWING A HVY TO RWY 25L. ATC CONTINUALLY ASKING IF I HAD THE HVY IN SIGHT. 'NO' I REPLIED. BRASILIA WAS TO FOLLOW ON RWY 25R NOT TO PASS ME. I WAS ASSIGNED 160 KTS, BRASILIA TURNED IN ON ME AND I SAW HIM AT 1:30 O'CLOCK POS, PARALLEL AT SAME TIME OF RA AND ATC'S DECISION TO TURN ME TO 140 DEGS HDG L. PROB: 1) TRYING TO ALWAYS CRAM MORE ACFT INTO SMALLER AREAS, 2) ATC ASSUMING FOR THEIR PLANNING THAT WE WILL ALWAYS EXCEPT A VISUAL. THUS ATC IS NOT READY AND WILL FOR ANY OTHER REPLY LIKE, 'NO CONTACT.' BRASILIA DID NOT MAINTAIN SEPARATION, AS INSTRUCTED BY ATC. WHEN I ADVISED ATC OF OUR DSCNT FOR AN RA, HIS RESPONSE WAS, 'YA, NO PROB, THAT IS JUST THE BRASILIA AT 1 O'CLOCK POS.' SORRY, TCASII RA'S TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE BRASILIA AND ANY OTHER ACFT CLOSE, AND TAKE PRECEDENT OVER ATC.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.