Narrative:

Flight 1 hour late, no pre departure clearance. At pushback, had to call for clearance. Filed SID was for 'st john' SID, cleared for 'dryheat' SID. Pushed back, perused SID during taxi out for runway 8L. Flight filed from phx to atl (eastbound), cleared for immediate takeoff. Flew to pxr then outbound on 075 degree radial to a DME, then transitioned to 070 degree radial to gilaa intersection. About 1 min later, departure said cleared to intercept 070 degree radial, then immediately another departure voice (supervisor?) asked if this was first clearance to intercept 070 degree radial. I chuckled, said 'yes,' and that 'it was surprising since we were already established on 070 degree radial.' I went back to SID to see that it called for turn to 100 degree heading at a DME off of 075 degrees, for all departures, even ebounds. At handoff to ZAB, I apologized and told departure I misread SID departure procedures. No comment. Remainder of flight uneventful. There were no aircraft conflicts due to my mistake. No TCASII traffic observance. No turns required because of conflicts. I believe my haste to make up time, and misread of SID caused problem. However, the departure instructions on SID makes this procedure very ambiguous and easy to misinterp.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B727 PIC FAILS TO FOLLOW THE DRYHEAT SID AFTER RECEIVING AN AMENDED CLRNC RTE CHANGE AT PHX.

Narrative: FLT 1 HR LATE, NO PDC. AT PUSHBACK, HAD TO CALL FOR CLRNC. FILED SID WAS FOR 'ST JOHN' SID, CLRED FOR 'DRYHEAT' SID. PUSHED BACK, PERUSED SID DURING TAXI OUT FOR RWY 8L. FLT FILED FROM PHX TO ATL (EBOUND), CLRED FOR IMMEDIATE TKOF. FLEW TO PXR THEN OUTBOUND ON 075 DEG RADIAL TO A DME, THEN TRANSITIONED TO 070 DEG RADIAL TO GILAA INTXN. ABOUT 1 MIN LATER, DEP SAID CLRED TO INTERCEPT 070 DEG RADIAL, THEN IMMEDIATELY ANOTHER DEP VOICE (SUPVR?) ASKED IF THIS WAS FIRST CLRNC TO INTERCEPT 070 DEG RADIAL. I CHUCKLED, SAID 'YES,' AND THAT 'IT WAS SURPRISING SINCE WE WERE ALREADY ESTABLISHED ON 070 DEG RADIAL.' I WENT BACK TO SID TO SEE THAT IT CALLED FOR TURN TO 100 DEG HDG AT A DME OFF OF 075 DEGS, FOR ALL DEPS, EVEN EBOUNDS. AT HDOF TO ZAB, I APOLOGIZED AND TOLD DEP I MISREAD SID DEP PROCS. NO COMMENT. REMAINDER OF FLT UNEVENTFUL. THERE WERE NO ACFT CONFLICTS DUE TO MY MISTAKE. NO TCASII TFC OBSERVANCE. NO TURNS REQUIRED BECAUSE OF CONFLICTS. I BELIEVE MY HASTE TO MAKE UP TIME, AND MISREAD OF SID CAUSED PROB. HOWEVER, THE DEP INSTRUCTIONS ON SID MAKES THIS PROC VERY AMBIGUOUS AND EASY TO MISINTERP.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.