![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 480357 |
| Time | |
| Date | 200007 |
| Day | Fri |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : sju.airport |
| State Reference | PR |
| Altitude | msl single value : 2000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : sju.tower |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | ATR 42 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach |
| Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : vfr |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : sju.tower |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | ATR 72 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach |
| Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : vfr |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 160 flight time total : 3800 flight time type : 1800 |
| ASRS Report | 480357 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : radar aircraft equipment : tcas other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : executed go around |
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 500 vertical : 600 |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
While on a bridge visual for runway 10, approach control told us to follow company ATR72 (who was well behind us at 8 O'clock position), for the runway. We were switched to tower and were cleared to land. The company ATR came very close to us on the approach and caused an RA. I immediately took evasive action and went around with tower and approach for runway 8. I believe that in an effort to clear incoming traffic the controller authority/authorized 2 aircraft for the bridge visual when only 1 aircraft was able to safely perform the approach. Our accepting the approach was a contributing factor to the near collision that almost occurred. In the future, I will not accept this approach unless I am the only aircraft on it.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: NMAC BTWN 2 ACR ATR SAME COMPANY ACFT DURING A PUBLISHED VISUAL APCH DUE TO THE CLOSE SPACING USED BY SJU APCH CTL RESULTING IN THE RPTR GOING AROUND IN RESPONSE TO A TCASII RA.
Narrative: WHILE ON A BRIDGE VISUAL FOR RWY 10, APCH CTL TOLD US TO FOLLOW COMPANY ATR72 (WHO WAS WELL BEHIND US AT 8 O'CLOCK POS), FOR THE RWY. WE WERE SWITCHED TO TWR AND WERE CLRED TO LAND. THE COMPANY ATR CAME VERY CLOSE TO US ON THE APCH AND CAUSED AN RA. I IMMEDIATELY TOOK EVASIVE ACTION AND WENT AROUND WITH TWR AND APCH FOR RWY 8. I BELIEVE THAT IN AN EFFORT TO CLR INCOMING TFC THE CTLR AUTH 2 ACFT FOR THE BRIDGE VISUAL WHEN ONLY 1 ACFT WAS ABLE TO SAFELY PERFORM THE APCH. OUR ACCEPTING THE APCH WAS A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE NEAR COLLISION THAT ALMOST OCCURRED. IN THE FUTURE, I WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS APCH UNLESS I AM THE ONLY ACFT ON IT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.