Narrative:

Flight departed the gate in st louis on may/tue/00. The first officer was to fly this leg. There was a delay in takeoff because of thunderstorms in the area. A reroute was issued shortly before takeoff and a new departure control frequency was issued. Shortly after takeoff it was discovered that the autoplt would not engage. The departure was hand flown with the aid of the flight director and autothrottles. There was turbulence and thunderstorm activity in the departure area and large heading changes (in excess of 120 degrees) were issued by the departure controller for WX avoidance and other aircraft traffic. We had been issued a clearance to climb to 15000 ft and were headed east, but not yet on our assigned departure. The first officer was still hand flying the aircraft in the clouds in light to occasional moderate turbulence. At approximately 13000-14000 ft I (the PNF) left the #1 radio to use the #2 radio for contacting the company with our out and off times, fuel onboard as well as our ETA for atlanta. As I finished this I heard the first officer say something to the effect of 'what is it doing, what's happening?' I looked up to find that the heading cursor had moved 180 degrees and the flight director was calling for a hard right climbing turn, the airspeed command bug had moved to 100 KTS and the autothrottles had retarded to maintain alpha speed. The altitude capture was disarmed and there were no altitude alert warnings during this maneuver. By the time we disconnected everything and recovered control we had passed through 15000 ft and had stopped the climb at 16000 ft. We were at that altitude for a very short time and started a descent just as ATC issued a clearance to immediately descend to 15000 ft which we did. It appeared that the flight guidance computer went through some sort of internal test. It appeared to operate normally for the remainder of the flight. The flight guidance computer and autoplt were written up as malfunctioning upon arrival in atlanta. I think that several things were involved in this altitude deviation. I believe that the failure of the autoplt to engage was the result of the impending flight guidance computer malfunction. The malfunction of the flight guidance computer was very confusing given the turbulence and WX conditions which made hand flying difficult at best and was the cause of this deviation. Another problem is the fact that the PNF was distracted by giving the required off report to the company just as this problem was developing. Automation of this required call would have helped greatly by allowing the PNF to more closely monitor system. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the captain stated that this was an earlier model of the MD80, purchased from a foreign airline. The throttles had retarded to the minimum control speed for the aircraft. The contract maintenance personnel at atl could not immediately define the problem so it is not known what the sign off was. They did reset all of the flight guidance computers. Captain was asked to call ATC when arriving at destination airport. Captain received a check ride and the first officer received a simulator review ride. Supplemental information from acn 472377: we were cleared to 15000 ft and were 20 to 30 miles ese of stl VOR heading east. Heading bug moved to a heading of about 285 degrees. Autothrottles retarded to maintain selected speed 100 KTS. Altitude capture was disarmed and no altitude warnings were heard.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN MD80 FLC, IN PROX OF TSTM ACTIVITY, CLBS 1000 FT ABOVE THEIR ASSIGNED ALT WHEN THE FLT GUIDANCE COMPUTER PRODUCES SOME DISTRACTING READOUTS 30 MI E OF STL, MO.

Narrative: FLT DEPARTED THE GATE IN ST LOUIS ON MAY/TUE/00. THE FO WAS TO FLY THIS LEG. THERE WAS A DELAY IN TKOF BECAUSE OF TSTMS IN THE AREA. A REROUTE WAS ISSUED SHORTLY BEFORE TKOF AND A NEW DEP CTL FREQ WAS ISSUED. SHORTLY AFTER TKOF IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE AUTOPLT WOULD NOT ENGAGE. THE DEP WAS HAND FLOWN WITH THE AID OF THE FLT DIRECTOR AND AUTOTHROTTLES. THERE WAS TURB AND TSTM ACTIVITY IN THE DEP AREA AND LARGE HEADING CHANGES (IN EXCESS OF 120 DEGS) WERE ISSUED BY THE DEP CTLR FOR WX AVOIDANCE AND OTHER ACFT TFC. WE HAD BEEN ISSUED A CLRNC TO CLB TO 15000 FT AND WERE HEADED E, BUT NOT YET ON OUR ASSIGNED DEP. THE FO WAS STILL HAND FLYING THE ACFT IN THE CLOUDS IN LIGHT TO OCCASIONAL MODERATE TURB. AT APPROX 13000-14000 FT I (THE PNF) LEFT THE #1 RADIO TO USE THE #2 RADIO FOR CONTACTING THE COMPANY WITH OUR OUT AND OFF TIMES, FUEL ONBOARD AS WELL AS OUR ETA FOR ATLANTA. AS I FINISHED THIS I HEARD THE FO SAY SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF 'WHAT IS IT DOING, WHAT'S HAPPENING?' I LOOKED UP TO FIND THAT THE HEADING CURSOR HAD MOVED 180 DEGS AND THE FLT DIRECTOR WAS CALLING FOR A HARD R CLBING TURN, THE AIRSPD COMMAND BUG HAD MOVED TO 100 KTS AND THE AUTOTHROTTLES HAD RETARDED TO MAINTAIN ALPHA SPD. THE ALT CAPTURE WAS DISARMED AND THERE WERE NO ALT ALERT WARNINGS DURING THIS MANEUVER. BY THE TIME WE DISCONNECTED EVERYTHING AND RECOVERED CTL WE HAD PASSED THROUGH 15000 FT AND HAD STOPPED THE CLB AT 16000 FT. WE WERE AT THAT ALT FOR A VERY SHORT TIME AND STARTED A DSCNT JUST AS ATC ISSUED A CLRNC TO IMMEDIATELY DSND TO 15000 FT WHICH WE DID. IT APPEARED THAT THE FLT GUIDANCE COMPUTER WENT THROUGH SOME SORT OF INTERNAL TEST. IT APPEARED TO OPERATE NORMALLY FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE FLT. THE FLT GUIDANCE COMPUTER AND AUTOPLT WERE WRITTEN UP AS MALFUNCTIONING UPON ARR IN ATLANTA. I THINK THAT SEVERAL THINGS WERE INVOLVED IN THIS ALTDEV. I BELIEVE THAT THE FAILURE OF THE AUTOPLT TO ENGAGE WAS THE RESULT OF THE IMPENDING FLT GUIDANCE COMPUTER MALFUNCTION. THE MALFUNCTION OF THE FLT GUIDANCE COMPUTER WAS VERY CONFUSING GIVEN THE TURB AND WX CONDITIONS WHICH MADE HAND FLYING DIFFICULT AT BEST AND WAS THE CAUSE OF THIS DEV. ANOTHER PROB IS THE FACT THAT THE PNF WAS DISTRACTED BY GIVING THE REQUIRED OFF RPT TO THE COMPANY JUST AS THIS PROB WAS DEVELOPING. AUTOMATION OF THIS REQUIRED CALL WOULD HAVE HELPED GREATLY BY ALLOWING THE PNF TO MORE CLOSELY MONITOR SYS. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE CAPT STATED THAT THIS WAS AN EARLIER MODEL OF THE MD80, PURCHASED FROM A FOREIGN AIRLINE. THE THROTTLES HAD RETARDED TO THE MINIMUM CTL SPD FOR THE ACFT. THE CONTRACT MAINT PERSONNEL AT ATL COULD NOT IMMEDIATELY DEFINE THE PROB SO IT IS NOT KNOWN WHAT THE SIGN OFF WAS. THEY DID RESET ALL OF THE FLT GUIDANCE COMPUTERS. CAPT WAS ASKED TO CALL ATC WHEN ARRIVING AT DEST ARPT. CAPT RECEIVED A CHK RIDE AND THE FO RECEIVED A SIMULATOR REVIEW RIDE. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 472377: WE WERE CLEARED TO 15000 FT AND WERE 20 TO 30 MILES ESE OF STL VOR HEADING E. HDG BUG MOVED TO A HDG OF ABOUT 285 DEGS. AUTOTHROTTLES RETARDED TO MAINTAIN SELECTED SPD 100 KTS. ALT CAPTURE WAS DISARMED AND NO ALT WARNINGS WERE HEARD.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.