Narrative:

The first officer was hand flying the aircraft when he experienced a 'hard over.' we lost approximately 400 ft (26600 ft) before the stall warnings could be turned off. When the stall warnings were disconnected we climbed approximately 800 ft (approximately 27400 ft) before we were able to get the aircraft back to FL270. We opted to land at daytona beach, fl, to research the problem. We had no further problems. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated the cause of the pitch hard over was the left stall warning system sensing a stall. The reporter said the autoplt reacted to the stall and pitch the aircraft over. The reporter said maintenance replaced the left stall warning sensor.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A LEAR 24 IN CRUISE AT FL270 WITH AUTOPLT ENGAGED EXPERIENCED A HARD OVER PITCH AND LOSS OF 400 FT CAUSED BY THE L STALL WARNING SYS.

Narrative: THE FO WAS HAND FLYING THE ACFT WHEN HE EXPERIENCED A 'HARD OVER.' WE LOST APPROX 400 FT (26600 FT) BEFORE THE STALL WARNINGS COULD BE TURNED OFF. WHEN THE STALL WARNINGS WERE DISCONNECTED WE CLBED APPROX 800 FT (APPROX 27400 FT) BEFORE WE WERE ABLE TO GET THE ACFT BACK TO FL270. WE OPTED TO LAND AT DAYTONA BEACH, FL, TO RESEARCH THE PROB. WE HAD NO FURTHER PROBS. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THE CAUSE OF THE PITCH HARD OVER WAS THE L STALL WARNING SYS SENSING A STALL. THE RPTR SAID THE AUTOPLT REACTED TO THE STALL AND PITCH THE ACFT OVER. THE RPTR SAID MAINT REPLACED THE L STALL WARNING SENSOR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.