Narrative:

First officer flying. We were given a crossing restr of 250 KTS/12000 ft 15 mi east of rober. The first officer verbalized adding 2 mi to make it 17 mi to assure the crossing. He entered the information into the FMS. It looked ok on the screen (HSI), but did not double-check the FMS point. Center called during our descent to confirm we had received the restr. The first officer then realized he had put in 2 not 17. Too late to make it. No conflict reported. More double-checking would have helped. Also, backing up with DME in manual VOR would have helped alleviate the problem. The best course however would probably be for center to give crossing restrs over a definite point on the FMS route rather than one we can wrongly invent.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AIRLINE CREW LOADS INCORRECT XING RESTR IN FLT MGMNT SYS. WHEN QUERIED BY ATC IT WAS TOO LATE TO MAKE THE RESTR.

Narrative: FO FLYING. WE WERE GIVEN A XING RESTR OF 250 KTS/12000 FT 15 MI E OF ROBER. THE FO VERBALIZED ADDING 2 MI TO MAKE IT 17 MI TO ASSURE THE XING. HE ENTERED THE INFO INTO THE FMS. IT LOOKED OK ON THE SCREEN (HSI), BUT DID NOT DOUBLE-CHK THE FMS POINT. CTR CALLED DURING OUR DSCNT TO CONFIRM WE HAD RECEIVED THE RESTR. THE FO THEN REALIZED HE HAD PUT IN 2 NOT 17. TOO LATE TO MAKE IT. NO CONFLICT RPTED. MORE DOUBLE-CHKING WOULD HAVE HELPED. ALSO, BACKING UP WITH DME IN MANUAL VOR WOULD HAVE HELPED ALLEVIATE THE PROB. THE BEST COURSE HOWEVER WOULD PROBABLY BE FOR CTR TO GIVE XING RESTRS OVER A DEFINITE POINT ON THE FMS RTE RATHER THAN ONE WE CAN WRONGLY INVENT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.