Narrative:

During walkaround the next crew idented the bump (dimple) on the tailskid on B737-800 had damage (slight scrape on paint). The tailskid indicator showed no compression or indication of ground contact. We had flown the aircraft for 2 legs. First officer had seen no damage during his walkaround. Both of our lndgs were made at flaps 40 degrees to minimize tailskid strike occurrence. I asked both flight attendants sitting in rear of aircraft, if they heard a scraping during any takeoff or landing. They both said no. I believe the damage was done prior to my taking the aircraft and that first officer just missed it on his walkaround.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SLIGHT TAILSKID DAMAGE DISCOVERED ON B737-800.

Narrative: DURING WALKAROUND THE NEXT CREW IDENTED THE BUMP (DIMPLE) ON THE TAILSKID ON B737-800 HAD DAMAGE (SLIGHT SCRAPE ON PAINT). THE TAILSKID INDICATOR SHOWED NO COMPRESSION OR INDICATION OF GND CONTACT. WE HAD FLOWN THE ACFT FOR 2 LEGS. FO HAD SEEN NO DAMAGE DURING HIS WALKAROUND. BOTH OF OUR LNDGS WERE MADE AT FLAPS 40 DEGS TO MINIMIZE TAILSKID STRIKE OCCURRENCE. I ASKED BOTH FLT ATTENDANTS SITTING IN REAR OF ACFT, IF THEY HEARD A SCRAPING DURING ANY TKOF OR LNDG. THEY BOTH SAID NO. I BELIEVE THE DAMAGE WAS DONE PRIOR TO MY TAKING THE ACFT AND THAT FO JUST MISSED IT ON HIS WALKAROUND.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.