Narrative:

I accomplished a section of the maintenance manual 05-96-02 on aircraft xyz, dec/fri/99 to the best of my ability. It's been brought to my attention that the card may have been written incorrectly. That would have affected the 'checks' performed. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated the maintenance manual chapter 5 did not have a sideload conditional check for the aircraft after being pulled from the mud. The reporter said a dragged pod conditional check was accomplished. The reporter said the dragged pod conditional check was fairly intensive and everything that needed checking was accomplished.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-800 EXPERIENCED A TXWY EXCURSION POSITIONING THE R MAIN LNDG OFF THE TXWY AND STUCK IN THE MUD.

Narrative: I ACCOMPLISHED A SECTION OF THE MAINT MANUAL 05-96-02 ON ACFT XYZ, DEC/FRI/99 TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY. IT'S BEEN BROUGHT TO MY ATTN THAT THE CARD MAY HAVE BEEN WRITTEN INCORRECTLY. THAT WOULD HAVE AFFECTED THE 'CHKS' PERFORMED. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THE MAINT MANUAL CHAPTER 5 DID NOT HAVE A SIDELOAD CONDITIONAL CHK FOR THE ACFT AFTER BEING PULLED FROM THE MUD. THE RPTR SAID A DRAGGED POD CONDITIONAL CHK WAS ACCOMPLISHED. THE RPTR SAID THE DRAGGED POD CONDITIONAL CHK WAS FAIRLY INTENSIVE AND EVERYTHING THAT NEEDED CHKING WAS ACCOMPLISHED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.