Narrative:

On nov/xa/99 I was assigned to fly a B737-400 aircraft on air carrier flight xyz to san diego from ZZZ with a return to ZZZ on flight zwv. That aircraft (tail #XXX) had an MEL on the APU for failure of the APU overheat detection system to cause the master caution light to illuminate. I believe that may have been an invalid MEL for the discrepancy noted. The actual discrepancy noted may have required more specific action than the MEL noted. Without more specific information, I perceived the MEL to be adequate. That may not have been the case.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-400 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH THE APU FIRE OVERHEAT LOOP INCORRECTLY DEFERRED AS INOP PER THE MEL.

Narrative: ON NOV/XA/99 I WAS ASSIGNED TO FLY A B737-400 ACFT ON ACR FLT XYZ TO SAN DIEGO FROM ZZZ WITH A RETURN TO ZZZ ON FLT ZWV. THAT ACFT (TAIL #XXX) HAD AN MEL ON THE APU FOR FAILURE OF THE APU OVERHEAT DETECTION SYS TO CAUSE THE MASTER CAUTION LIGHT TO ILLUMINATE. I BELIEVE THAT MAY HAVE BEEN AN INVALID MEL FOR THE DISCREPANCY NOTED. THE ACTUAL DISCREPANCY NOTED MAY HAVE REQUIRED MORE SPECIFIC ACTION THAN THE MEL NOTED. WITHOUT MORE SPECIFIC INFO, I PERCEIVED THE MEL TO BE ADEQUATE. THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN THE CASE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.