Narrative:

Flight plan had route stl-rzc-fsm-rzc. Fsm cannot be naved with /a equipped aircraft. This is a recurring problem, ie, dispatch filing rtes that cannot be naved without long-range navigation. If I am wrong, and it is appropriate to file rtes which we cannot navigation, why don't we file radar vectors direct? It will save a lot of time and money.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN S80 CAPT IS FRUSTRATED THAT HIS DISPATCH DEPT CONTINUES TO FILE FLT PLANS FOR WHICH THE ACFT ASSIGNED IS NOT EQUIPPED.

Narrative: FLT PLAN HAD RTE STL-RZC-FSM-RZC. FSM CANNOT BE NAVED WITH /A EQUIPPED ACFT. THIS IS A RECURRING PROB, IE, DISPATCH FILING RTES THAT CANNOT BE NAVED WITHOUT LONG-RANGE NAV. IF I AM WRONG, AND IT IS APPROPRIATE TO FILE RTES WHICH WE CANNOT NAV, WHY DON'T WE FILE RADAR VECTORS DIRECT? IT WILL SAVE A LOT OF TIME AND MONEY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.