 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
FK50 crew landed on wrong runway.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 448985 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199909 |
| Day | Sun |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : ind.airport |
| State Reference | IN |
| Altitude | msl single value : 7000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : ind.tracon tower : ind.tower |
| Operator | general aviation : corporate |
| Make Model Name | Fokker 50 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 23l |
| Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : roll |
| Route In Use | approach : visual |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : ind.tracon tower : ind.tower |
| Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
| Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 23r |
| Flight Phase | cruise : descent descent : approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : corporate |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 110 flight time total : 3350 flight time type : 370 |
| ASRS Report | 448985 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : corporate |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far non adherence : clearance |
| Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance ATC Human Performance |
| Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
| Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
WX at the time was VMC. Arrived in the terminal area at 7000 ft and reported ATIS received and airport in sight. ATIS said runway 23L&right approachs in use. We were told to expect an ILS to runway 23R. At some point we were cleared for a visual for runway 23L. Neither of us remembered that clearance. When established on final, an aircraft reported we were landing on his runway. At no time during the approach or landing were we questioned about our alignment with runway 23R. It was not till after landing we heard the other aircraft mention us landing on his runway. I feel that when cleared for a visual the pilot should read back the runway numbers and letters, ie, runway 23R.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FK50 CREW LANDED ON WRONG RWY.
Narrative: WX AT THE TIME WAS VMC. ARRIVED IN THE TERMINAL AREA AT 7000 FT AND RPTED ATIS RECEIVED AND ARPT IN SIGHT. ATIS SAID RWY 23L&R APCHS IN USE. WE WERE TOLD TO EXPECT AN ILS TO RWY 23R. AT SOME POINT WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL FOR RWY 23L. NEITHER OF US REMEMBERED THAT CLRNC. WHEN ESTABLISHED ON FINAL, AN ACFT RPTED WE WERE LNDG ON HIS RWY. AT NO TIME DURING THE APCH OR LNDG WERE WE QUESTIONED ABOUT OUR ALIGNMENT WITH RWY 23R. IT WAS NOT TILL AFTER LNDG WE HEARD THE OTHER ACFT MENTION US LNDG ON HIS RWY. I FEEL THAT WHEN CLRED FOR A VISUAL THE PLT SHOULD READ BACK THE RWY NUMBERS AND LETTERS, IE, RWY 23R.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.