Narrative:

Aircraft was aerocommander 680. I personally fueled the aircraft to capacity before the flight. The poh states 223 gals useable fuel. After a 4 1/2 hour flight, with a calculated burn of 153 gals (at 17 gph/engine) plus 25 gals for climb (10000 ft), both engines quit outside the marker while being vectored to intercept the ILS. I switched to the outboard tanks, and power was restored for 10-15 seconds. Again I switched back to the main tank, but without result. At that time, the main tank fuel gauge read 27 gals. At that point I called critical fuel to the tower, and was cleared to land straight in runway 35. It was obvious that I would not make the runway with both engines windmilling, so I feathered both propellers, set best glide, and dead-sticked in. I lowered the gear on short final, and began to pump the flaps down to slow down, and restore hydraulic pressure for the brakes and steering. The touchdown was uneventful. I exited the runway to the left on the high speed, cleared the parallel taxiway, and rolled to a stop on the west ramp parking area. The aircraft was then topped off to capacity. Fuel: 187.4 gals. Suspected cause: the capacity of the aircraft's total tankage is substantially less than 223 gals (misset bladders?). Contributing factor: 25 gal error in main tank gauge. The actual capacity of the aircraft will be measured. The main tank gauge will be checked/recalibrated. ATC handling of the incident was superb-timely, professional, efficient. The tower cabin attendant called the FBO afterwards, and I had a telephone chat with the controller. He was so helpful as to dig up this NASA form for me. Great guy, great system. My performance was adequate, however, somewhere in the MEL training syllabus, some mention should be made of the technique and feathering both engines to extend the glide in a dire emergency. I guess if I hadn't seen it done before in a strike commander, I wouldn't have thought to do it. It saved the airplane, and maybe me too.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: SMT PLT HAD DOUBLE ENG FAILURE.

Narrative: ACFT WAS AEROCOMMANDER 680. I PERSONALLY FUELED THE ACFT TO CAPACITY BEFORE THE FLT. THE POH STATES 223 GALS USEABLE FUEL. AFTER A 4 1/2 HR FLT, WITH A CALCULATED BURN OF 153 GALS (AT 17 GPH/ENG) PLUS 25 GALS FOR CLB (10000 FT), BOTH ENGS QUIT OUTSIDE THE MARKER WHILE BEING VECTORED TO INTERCEPT THE ILS. I SWITCHED TO THE OUTBOARD TANKS, AND PWR WAS RESTORED FOR 10-15 SECONDS. AGAIN I SWITCHED BACK TO THE MAIN TANK, BUT WITHOUT RESULT. AT THAT TIME, THE MAIN TANK FUEL GAUGE READ 27 GALS. AT THAT POINT I CALLED CRITICAL FUEL TO THE TWR, AND WAS CLRED TO LAND STRAIGHT IN RWY 35. IT WAS OBVIOUS THAT I WOULD NOT MAKE THE RWY WITH BOTH ENGS WINDMILLING, SO I FEATHERED BOTH PROPS, SET BEST GLIDE, AND DEAD-STICKED IN. I LOWERED THE GEAR ON SHORT FINAL, AND BEGAN TO PUMP THE FLAPS DOWN TO SLOW DOWN, AND RESTORE HYD PRESSURE FOR THE BRAKES AND STEERING. THE TOUCHDOWN WAS UNEVENTFUL. I EXITED THE RWY TO THE L ON THE HIGH SPD, CLRED THE PARALLEL TXWY, AND ROLLED TO A STOP ON THE W RAMP PARKING AREA. THE ACFT WAS THEN TOPPED OFF TO CAPACITY. FUEL: 187.4 GALS. SUSPECTED CAUSE: THE CAPACITY OF THE ACFT'S TOTAL TANKAGE IS SUBSTANTIALLY LESS THAN 223 GALS (MISSET BLADDERS?). CONTRIBUTING FACTOR: 25 GAL ERROR IN MAIN TANK GAUGE. THE ACTUAL CAPACITY OF THE ACFT WILL BE MEASURED. THE MAIN TANK GAUGE WILL BE CHKED/RECALIBRATED. ATC HANDLING OF THE INCIDENT WAS SUPERB-TIMELY, PROFESSIONAL, EFFICIENT. THE TWR CAB CALLED THE FBO AFTERWARDS, AND I HAD A TELEPHONE CHAT WITH THE CTLR. HE WAS SO HELPFUL AS TO DIG UP THIS NASA FORM FOR ME. GREAT GUY, GREAT SYS. MY PERFORMANCE WAS ADEQUATE, HOWEVER, SOMEWHERE IN THE MEL TRAINING SYLLABUS, SOME MENTION SHOULD BE MADE OF THE TECHNIQUE AND FEATHERING BOTH ENGS TO EXTEND THE GLIDE IN A DIRE EMER. I GUESS IF I HADN'T SEEN IT DONE BEFORE IN A STRIKE COMMANDER, I WOULDN'T HAVE THOUGHT TO DO IT. IT SAVED THE AIRPLANE, AND MAYBE ME TOO.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.