![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 443679 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199907 |
| Day | Tue |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | navaid : mod.vor |
| State Reference | CA |
| Altitude | msl single value : 9000 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tracon : o90.tracon |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | Light Transport, High Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Navigation In Use | other vortac |
| Flight Phase | cruise : level |
| Route In Use | arrival star : modesto 2 |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Operator | general aviation : personal |
| Make Model Name | Experimental |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : + ils localizer only : 332 |
| Flight Plan | VFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 2800 flight time type : 800 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | conflict : nmac |
| Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
| Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
| Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 200 |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Airspace Structure |
| Primary Problem | Airspace Structure |
Narrative:
On the modesto 2 arrival, going to sfo, we (aircraft X) noted a yellow TA symbol on TCASII at the 1:30 O'clock position, traveling toward us rapidly. This symbol was accompanied by the 'traffic, traffic!' advisory. We sighted the aircraft Y traffic, a low wing experimental type, approximately 1/4 SM and 100 ft below. I (aircraft X) then initiated a rapid climb to 9400 ft, missing the aircraft Y by about 200 ft, as it passed directly below. The aircraft Y involved did not have mode C transponder capabilities, because the yellow TA had no altitude information. The aircraft Y appeared to be in cruise flight, at an IFR altitude, headed in the wrong direction. I do not believe that the aircraft Y was under the class B veil. ATC knew nothing of this aircraft Y. It would be to the flying public's benefit if all aircraft require mode C capabilities. Also, if the GA group were more educated on arrival/departure rtes in congested airspace, this incident could have been prevented.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC IN SMALL ACR INBOUND TO SFO VIA THE MOD RTE ENCOUNTER SMA ACFT WITH NO MODE C AND ARE REQUIRED TO TAKE EVASIVE ACTION.
Narrative: ON THE MODESTO 2 ARR, GOING TO SFO, WE (ACFT X) NOTED A YELLOW TA SYMBOL ON TCASII AT THE 1:30 O'CLOCK POS, TRAVELING TOWARD US RAPIDLY. THIS SYMBOL WAS ACCOMPANIED BY THE 'TFC, TFC!' ADVISORY. WE SIGHTED THE ACFT Y TFC, A LOW WING EXPERIMENTAL TYPE, APPROX 1/4 SM AND 100 FT BELOW. I (ACFT X) THEN INITIATED A RAPID CLB TO 9400 FT, MISSING THE ACFT Y BY ABOUT 200 FT, AS IT PASSED DIRECTLY BELOW. THE ACFT Y INVOLVED DID NOT HAVE MODE C XPONDER CAPABILITIES, BECAUSE THE YELLOW TA HAD NO ALT INFO. THE ACFT Y APPEARED TO BE IN CRUISE FLT, AT AN IFR ALT, HEADED IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE ACFT Y WAS UNDER THE CLASS B VEIL. ATC KNEW NOTHING OF THIS ACFT Y. IT WOULD BE TO THE FLYING PUBLIC'S BENEFIT IF ALL ACFT REQUIRE MODE C CAPABILITIES. ALSO, IF THE GA GROUP WERE MORE EDUCATED ON ARR/DEP RTES IN CONGESTED AIRSPACE, THIS INCIDENT COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.