Narrative:

The clearance was very confusing from toronto. The way he issued it was to cross fix at 10000 ft and then the profile descent. When in fact what was meant was cross the last fix on the profile, descend to runway 24 at 10000 ft 'following the profile descent.' center asked us why we deviated from the profile descent and after we explained he said that they just changed the way they issue the clearance and that it is causing a lot of confusion and we were not the first to deviate from what was meant. I feel this should be changed right away.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CHARTERED JET FAILS TO FOLLOW THE PROFILE DSCNT PARAMETERS WHEN CLRED TO 'CROSS FIX AT 10000 FT' NEAR CYYZ, ON.

Narrative: THE CLRNC WAS VERY CONFUSING FROM TORONTO. THE WAY HE ISSUED IT WAS TO CROSS FIX AT 10000 FT AND THEN THE PROFILE DSCNT. WHEN IN FACT WHAT WAS MEANT WAS CROSS THE LAST FIX ON THE PROFILE, DSND TO RWY 24 AT 10000 FT 'FOLLOWING THE PROFILE DSCNT.' CTR ASKED US WHY WE DEVIATED FROM THE PROFILE DSCNT AND AFTER WE EXPLAINED HE SAID THAT THEY JUST CHANGED THE WAY THEY ISSUE THE CLRNC AND THAT IT IS CAUSING A LOT OF CONFUSION AND WE WERE NOT THE FIRST TO DEVIATE FROM WHAT WAS MEANT. I FEEL THIS SHOULD BE CHANGED RIGHT AWAY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.