Narrative:

On apr/xa/99, received a certified letter from FAA stating I performed work on a DC9-30 autoplt system, and that after a satisfactory check, the proper procedure for returning an aircraft for service was not followed as prescribed in air carrier maintenance procedures. After reviewing the maintenance procedures, my terminology on the corrective action signoff could/should have been better detailed.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DC9-30 WAS DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH AN AUTOPLT RETURNED TO SVC AFTER A CHK BUT NOT SIGNED OFF CORRECTLY IN THE LOGBOOK.

Narrative: ON APR/XA/99, RECEIVED A CERTIFIED LETTER FROM FAA STATING I PERFORMED WORK ON A DC9-30 AUTOPLT SYS, AND THAT AFTER A SATISFACTORY CHK, THE PROPER PROC FOR RETURNING AN ACFT FOR SVC WAS NOT FOLLOWED AS PRESCRIBED IN ACR MAINT PROCS. AFTER REVIEWING THE MAINT PROCS, MY TERMINOLOGY ON THE CORRECTIVE ACTION SIGNOFF COULD/SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER DETAILED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.