Narrative:

Our jet aircraft was cleared for takeoff on runway 11 at bjc airport. After the gear and flaps were up and the initial power reduction was initiated to maintain 200 KTS in the climb to 8000 ft (we were cleared 8000 ft and a left turn to either 90 degrees or 60 degrees) we received a TA on the TCASII. I was in the right seat and was scanning outside for traffic. The left seat pilot was inside looking at the TCASII and advised me '7600 ft traffic 10 O'clock.' at the same time, the tower advised us of 7600 ft traffic, and to go over to departure. At this time (approximately 7000 ft in the climb) we received an RA 'climb, climb, climb,' which we did. As we passed 8000 ft I advised ATC that we were going through 8000 ft due to an RA. We were then told to continue the climb. We did not see the other aircraft. The other aircraft at 7600 ft was too close to bjc without contacting the tower. The tower should have advised us prior to takeoff of any aircraft within 90 degrees left or right of our takeoff heading and less than 5 mi from the airport if they were not talking to the aircraft.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NMAC. FLC OF A CPR JET ON INITIAL CLB AFTER TKOF INCREASED CLB RATE IN RESPONSE TO A TCASII RA OVERSHOOTING ASSIGNED INTERMEDIATE DEP ALT. TWR ISSUED TA AFTER FLC RESPONDED TO THE TCASII RA.

Narrative: OUR JET ACFT WAS CLRED FOR TKOF ON RWY 11 AT BJC ARPT. AFTER THE GEAR AND FLAPS WERE UP AND THE INITIAL PWR REDUCTION WAS INITIATED TO MAINTAIN 200 KTS IN THE CLB TO 8000 FT (WE WERE CLRED 8000 FT AND A L TURN TO EITHER 90 DEGS OR 60 DEGS) WE RECEIVED A TA ON THE TCASII. I WAS IN THE R SEAT AND WAS SCANNING OUTSIDE FOR TFC. THE L SEAT PLT WAS INSIDE LOOKING AT THE TCASII AND ADVISED ME '7600 FT TFC 10 O'CLOCK.' AT THE SAME TIME, THE TWR ADVISED US OF 7600 FT TFC, AND TO GO OVER TO DEP. AT THIS TIME (APPROX 7000 FT IN THE CLB) WE RECEIVED AN RA 'CLB, CLB, CLB,' WHICH WE DID. AS WE PASSED 8000 FT I ADVISED ATC THAT WE WERE GOING THROUGH 8000 FT DUE TO AN RA. WE WERE THEN TOLD TO CONTINUE THE CLB. WE DID NOT SEE THE OTHER ACFT. THE OTHER ACFT AT 7600 FT WAS TOO CLOSE TO BJC WITHOUT CONTACTING THE TWR. THE TWR SHOULD HAVE ADVISED US PRIOR TO TKOF OF ANY ACFT WITHIN 90 DEGS L OR R OF OUR TKOF HDG AND LESS THAN 5 MI FROM THE ARPT IF THEY WERE NOT TALKING TO THE ACFT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.