Narrative:

Stabilizer trim for computerized weight and balance data showed 3.9. Captain advised dispatcher had to use 8.5 units of trim to get aircraft airborne -- 6.2 units of trim for landing. Cargo distribution was verified by arrival station personnel. Problem may be with new computer system and the procedure used for seat assignments of passenger. Operations engineering to be advised of this problem. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated this computer problem of calculating the wrong aircraft trim has occurred several times and is being corrected. The reporter said the computer is supposed to assign seats to balance the aircraft but instead randomly assigned seats that when used in the trim calculation caused a large error.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-400 REQUIRED EXCESSIVE TRIM FOR TKOF AND LNDG DUE TO A WT AND BAL COMPUTER ERROR.

Narrative: STABILIZER TRIM FOR COMPUTERIZED WT AND BAL DATA SHOWED 3.9. CAPT ADVISED DISPATCHER HAD TO USE 8.5 UNITS OF TRIM TO GET ACFT AIRBORNE -- 6.2 UNITS OF TRIM FOR LNDG. CARGO DISTRIBUTION WAS VERIFIED BY ARR STATION PERSONNEL. PROB MAY BE WITH NEW COMPUTER SYS AND THE PROC USED FOR SEAT ASSIGNMENTS OF PAX. OPS ENGINEERING TO BE ADVISED OF THIS PROB. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THIS COMPUTER PROB OF CALCULATING THE WRONG ACFT TRIM HAS OCCURRED SEVERAL TIMES AND IS BEING CORRECTED. THE RPTR SAID THE COMPUTER IS SUPPOSED TO ASSIGN SEATS TO BAL THE ACFT BUT INSTEAD RANDOMLY ASSIGNED SEATS THAT WHEN USED IN THE TRIM CALCULATION CAUSED A LARGE ERROR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.