![]() |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 432203 |
| Time | |
| Date | 199903 |
| Day | Tue |
| Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | airport : iah.airport |
| State Reference | TX |
| Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Controlling Facilities | tower : iah.tower |
| Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
| Make Model Name | B777 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
| Navigation In Use | other |
| Flight Phase | ground : takeoff roll |
| Route In Use | departure : on vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : first officer |
| Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
| Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 300 |
| ASRS Report | 432203 |
| Person 2 | |
| Affiliation | company : air carrier |
| Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
| Qualification | pilot : atp |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical non adherence : company policies other anomaly other |
| Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : computer data audit |
| Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
| Consequence | other |
| Supplementary | |
| Problem Areas | Company Aircraft |
| Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
My ewr supervisor alleges a captain and I took off over gross weight allowable according to computer self-generated data retrieved during an audit. I stated we did receive a #2 accuload for runway 26 which showed us within takeoff parameters. Supervisor states the load planning computer only printed a #1 accuload for runway 15L at iah. I replied that I am only recalling the situation from memory and that I do not have the advantage of all of the paperwork before me. I know for a fact another flight the day after us was in the same situation and that the captain told me they did in fact receive a #2 accuload for runway 26 after initially receiving a #1 accuload for runway 15L.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B777 WAS ALLEGED TO HAVE TAKEN OFF OVER ALLOWABLE GROSS WT LIMITS.
Narrative: MY EWR SUPVR ALLEGES A CAPT AND I TOOK OFF OVER GROSS WT ALLOWABLE ACCORDING TO COMPUTER SELF-GENERATED DATA RETRIEVED DURING AN AUDIT. I STATED WE DID RECEIVE A #2 ACCULOAD FOR RWY 26 WHICH SHOWED US WITHIN TKOF PARAMETERS. SUPVR STATES THE LOAD PLANNING COMPUTER ONLY PRINTED A #1 ACCULOAD FOR RWY 15L AT IAH. I REPLIED THAT I AM ONLY RECALLING THE SIT FROM MEMORY AND THAT I DO NOT HAVE THE ADVANTAGE OF ALL OF THE PAPERWORK BEFORE ME. I KNOW FOR A FACT ANOTHER FLT THE DAY AFTER US WAS IN THE SAME SIT AND THAT THE CAPT TOLD ME THEY DID IN FACT RECEIVE A #2 ACCULOAD FOR RWY 26 AFTER INITIALLY RECEIVING A #1 ACCULOAD FOR RWY 15L.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.