Narrative:

Aircraft was being vectored for sequence into sea, FL310. ATC gave us a heading to fly and a descent clearance to FL290, then cleared us to FL260. Autoplt is a very old model and was very jerky, so I decided to hand fly the aircraft out of FL300. Both the first officer and I had our instruments set for the glcr 3 STAR. Instruments on the first officer's side were good, mine had a flag. The position deviation indicator had been written up several times in previous days, but the write-ups had been cleared. I heard the altitude encoder go off and called '1000 ft to go.' when I looked at the altimeter, we were descending through FL255. Got the aircraft back to FL260, just as ATC cleared us to FL240. The flight was completed without further incident. Obviously, the navigation instrument indications took up too much of my attention. Contributing to this loss of situational awareness on my part were the nonstandard panel layout and instruments in this particular act, as well as the knowledge of previous malfunctions in the recent past. In addition, had I left the autoplt on for descent, I would have had more time to check on the aircraft's flight path, as well as the instruments. This occurrence shows the importance of having a standardized fleet with the same layout and type of instruments on the panel. In addition, flight crew should be extra alert when flying a nonstandard aircraft, and make allowances for a slower-than-normal scan, due to the different cockpit layout.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DC8-55 FREIGHTER CAPT OVERSHOOTS HIS ASSIGNED ALT WHILE HAND FLYING THE ACFT.

Narrative: ACFT WAS BEING VECTORED FOR SEQUENCE INTO SEA, FL310. ATC GAVE US A HDG TO FLY AND A DSCNT CLRNC TO FL290, THEN CLRED US TO FL260. AUTOPLT IS A VERY OLD MODEL AND WAS VERY JERKY, SO I DECIDED TO HAND FLY THE ACFT OUT OF FL300. BOTH THE FO AND I HAD OUR INSTS SET FOR THE GLCR 3 STAR. INSTS ON THE FO'S SIDE WERE GOOD, MINE HAD A FLAG. THE POS DEV INDICATOR HAD BEEN WRITTEN UP SEVERAL TIMES IN PREVIOUS DAYS, BUT THE WRITE-UPS HAD BEEN CLRED. I HEARD THE ALT ENCODER GO OFF AND CALLED '1000 FT TO GO.' WHEN I LOOKED AT THE ALTIMETER, WE WERE DSNDING THROUGH FL255. GOT THE ACFT BACK TO FL260, JUST AS ATC CLRED US TO FL240. THE FLT WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. OBVIOUSLY, THE NAV INST INDICATIONS TOOK UP TOO MUCH OF MY ATTN. CONTRIBUTING TO THIS LOSS OF SITUATIONAL AWARENESS ON MY PART WERE THE NONSTANDARD PANEL LAYOUT AND INSTS IN THIS PARTICULAR ACT, AS WELL AS THE KNOWLEDGE OF PREVIOUS MALFUNCTIONS IN THE RECENT PAST. IN ADDITION, HAD I LEFT THE AUTOPLT ON FOR DSCNT, I WOULD HAVE HAD MORE TIME TO CHK ON THE ACFT'S FLT PATH, AS WELL AS THE INSTS. THIS OCCURRENCE SHOWS THE IMPORTANCE OF HAVING A STANDARDIZED FLEET WITH THE SAME LAYOUT AND TYPE OF INSTS ON THE PANEL. IN ADDITION, FLC SHOULD BE EXTRA ALERT WHEN FLYING A NONSTANDARD ACFT, AND MAKE ALLOWANCES FOR A SLOWER-THAN-NORMAL SCAN, DUE TO THE DIFFERENT COCKPIT LAYOUT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.