Narrative:

We had copied the XX51Z ATIS information for lindbergh field, which stated the localizer runway 27 approach was in use. The first officer briefed as this was his leg. There was no mention on ATIS information of the DME OTS. When we were handed off to socal approach (and eventually cleared for the approach), we reported we had ATIS information. We were not advised the ATIS was updated or that the DME was OTS. We began our dscnts based on the DME we were receiving, which resulted in being lower at reebo FAF and setting off the low altitude alert. We corrected and made an uneventful landing at XA39Z.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF AN ACR MD80 CHKED ATIS IN A TIMELY SEQUENCE PRIOR TO APCH AND LNDG AND FOUND THEMSELVES LOWER THAN CALLED FOR AT THE FAF DUE TO THE DME FOR A LOC APCH BEING OTS. THE UPDATED ATIS COVERED THIS OUTAGE, WHICH THEY DID NOT HAVE, NOR DID APCH CTLR BRIEF THEM REGARDING THIS OUTAGE WHEN CLRING THEM FOR THE LOC APCH.

Narrative: WE HAD COPIED THE XX51Z ATIS INFO FOR LINDBERGH FIELD, WHICH STATED THE LOC RWY 27 APCH WAS IN USE. THE FO BRIEFED AS THIS WAS HIS LEG. THERE WAS NO MENTION ON ATIS INFO OF THE DME OTS. WHEN WE WERE HANDED OFF TO SOCAL APCH (AND EVENTUALLY CLRED FOR THE APCH), WE RPTED WE HAD ATIS INFO. WE WERE NOT ADVISED THE ATIS WAS UPDATED OR THAT THE DME WAS OTS. WE BEGAN OUR DSCNTS BASED ON THE DME WE WERE RECEIVING, WHICH RESULTED IN BEING LOWER AT REEBO FAF AND SETTING OFF THE LOW ALT ALERT. WE CORRECTED AND MADE AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG AT XA39Z.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.