Narrative:

The flight plan was hmv cheda sweed 4. We were cleared as filed. On climb out, we were given a heading of 310 degrees direct cheda when able from knoxville approach. We set the FMS up and went direct. ZID said fly 360 degrees to join. We said we were given direct cheda and were told, roger that will work. The next sector asked what we were doing. We were told, fly north to join. We explained and were given direction that they may need to give us vectors for spacing. We felt, due to the confusion from knoxville departure, nothing would have happened or if that was what departure meant then explain to ATC so no confusion would exit later. There have been other sits similar from knoxville as other crews have informed. I feel they need to be more precise about what they want at knoxville approach.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF A CANADAIR REGIONAL JET CL65 HAD CONFUSION OVER THE CLRNC INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN BY DEP CTL AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE CTR. HOWEVER, THE CTR GAVE VECTORS TO PROVIDE STANDARD SPACING WITH OTHER TFC AND YET PUT RPTR ON INTENDED FLT PLAN TRACK.

Narrative: THE FLT PLAN WAS HMV CHEDA SWEED 4. WE WERE CLRED AS FILED. ON CLBOUT, WE WERE GIVEN A HDG OF 310 DEGS DIRECT CHEDA WHEN ABLE FROM KNOXVILLE APCH. WE SET THE FMS UP AND WENT DIRECT. ZID SAID FLY 360 DEGS TO JOIN. WE SAID WE WERE GIVEN DIRECT CHEDA AND WERE TOLD, ROGER THAT WILL WORK. THE NEXT SECTOR ASKED WHAT WE WERE DOING. WE WERE TOLD, FLY N TO JOIN. WE EXPLAINED AND WERE GIVEN DIRECTION THAT THEY MAY NEED TO GIVE US VECTORS FOR SPACING. WE FELT, DUE TO THE CONFUSION FROM KNOXVILLE DEP, NOTHING WOULD HAVE HAPPENED OR IF THAT WAS WHAT DEP MEANT THEN EXPLAIN TO ATC SO NO CONFUSION WOULD EXIT LATER. THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER SITS SIMILAR FROM KNOXVILLE AS OTHER CREWS HAVE INFORMED. I FEEL THEY NEED TO BE MORE PRECISE ABOUT WHAT THEY WANT AT KNOXVILLE APCH.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.