Narrative:

We were given an initial clearance to fly runway heading to 3000 ft MSL after takeoff. Shortly after takeoff while talking to mia departure we received what we thought was a clearance to 6000 ft MSL, which is the altitude that I read back. As a result, during our climb on a heading of 360 degrees, we received a TCASII TA followed by an RA to descend. The conflicting traffic was another jet at 6000 ft MSL. Conflict resolved. Looking back on the situation, I thought I read back 6000 ft, and if this was in error ATC should have corrected my readback. It worked out to the advantage of both aircraft that it was VMC and our TCASII computer worked flawlessly.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: APPARENT LOSS OF SEPARATION BTWN RPTR'S MLG CLBING THROUGH 5500 FT FOR 6000 FT AND ANOTHER JET AT 6000 FT.

Narrative: WE WERE GIVEN AN INITIAL CLRNC TO FLY RWY HDG TO 3000 FT MSL AFTER TKOF. SHORTLY AFTER TKOF WHILE TALKING TO MIA DEP WE RECEIVED WHAT WE THOUGHT WAS A CLRNC TO 6000 FT MSL, WHICH IS THE ALT THAT I READ BACK. AS A RESULT, DURING OUR CLB ON A HDG OF 360 DEGS, WE RECEIVED A TCASII TA FOLLOWED BY AN RA TO DSND. THE CONFLICTING TFC WAS ANOTHER JET AT 6000 FT MSL. CONFLICT RESOLVED. LOOKING BACK ON THE SIT, I THOUGHT I READ BACK 6000 FT, AND IF THIS WAS IN ERROR ATC SHOULD HAVE CORRECTED MY READBACK. IT WORKED OUT TO THE ADVANTAGE OF BOTH ACFT THAT IT WAS VMC AND OUR TCASII COMPUTER WORKED FLAWLESSLY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.