Narrative:

During takeoff on runway 27 we had erratic airspeed indications. Aborted the takeoff. ATC was notified of the abort, and we taxied to the ramp. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated the aircraft was a canadair CL65 regional jet and had the first officer's pitot static system checked for erratic airspeed indications on an overnight layover. The reporter said they were the first crew to fly the aircraft after maintenance and the logbook sign-off indicated the fix was draining water from the pitot static lines. The reporter stated after rejecting the takeoff and writing a new maintenance gripe there was no report from maintenance on what was the positive fix.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A CANADAIR CL65 REGIONAL JET DURING TKOF REJECTED THE TKOF DUE TO ERRATIC FO'S AIRSPD INDICATIONS AND A 20 KT DIFFERENCE BTWN CAPT'S AND FO'S INSTS.

Narrative: DURING TKOF ON RWY 27 WE HAD ERRATIC AIRSPD INDICATIONS. ABORTED THE TKOF. ATC WAS NOTIFIED OF THE ABORT, AND WE TAXIED TO THE RAMP. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THE ACFT WAS A CANADAIR CL65 REGIONAL JET AND HAD THE FO'S PITOT STATIC SYS CHKED FOR ERRATIC AIRSPD INDICATIONS ON AN OVERNIGHT LAYOVER. THE RPTR SAID THEY WERE THE FIRST CREW TO FLY THE ACFT AFTER MAINT AND THE LOGBOOK SIGN-OFF INDICATED THE FIX WAS DRAINING WATER FROM THE PITOT STATIC LINES. THE RPTR STATED AFTER REJECTING THE TKOF AND WRITING A NEW MAINT GRIPE THERE WAS NO RPT FROM MAINT ON WHAT WAS THE POSITIVE FIX.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.