Narrative:

ATC cleared us to fly a heading to intercept the dfw 134 degree radial to resume the arrival to dfw. I read back, 'intercept the dfw 134 degree radial to resume...' then, later, the next controller asked why we were north of the inbound radial. I explained that we realized the arrival radial is the 124 degree, but that the previous controller issued, and I read back, the 134 degree radial. Nothing more was said by the controller. No conflicts occurred.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN S80 FLT IS FOUND TO BE INBOUND ON THE 134 DEG RADIAL FOR A STAR ARR PROC INTO DFW. RADAR CTLR #2 ASKS WHY THE 134 DEG RADIAL VERSUS THE PUBLISHED 124 DEG RADIAL?

Narrative: ATC CLRED US TO FLY A HEADING TO INTERCEPT THE DFW 134 DEG RADIAL TO RESUME THE ARR TO DFW. I READ BACK, 'INTERCEPT THE DFW 134 DEG RADIAL TO RESUME...' THEN, LATER, THE NEXT CTLR ASKED WHY WE WERE N OF THE INBOUND RADIAL. I EXPLAINED THAT WE REALIZED THE ARR RADIAL IS THE 124 DEG, BUT THAT THE PREVIOUS CTLR ISSUED, AND I READ BACK, THE 134 DEG RADIAL. NOTHING MORE WAS SAID BY THE CTLR. NO CONFLICTS OCCURRED.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.