Narrative:

ASOS installation: wind instrument installed at south end of airport in partially sheltered location. Differs by 50 degrees or more during northwest winds when compared to mid-field wind sensors. Additionally, this sensor is approximately 2 mi from the approach end of runway 19R/19L. I believe this instrument does not give a good representation of wind conditions. Tower and approach have direct reading instruments from the mid-field sensor, which I believe is the best location. Two issues arise here: first the WX service intends to decommission the mid- field sensor now that ASOS is on-line. Second, the official WX observation uses the ASOS instrument for the WX sequence presently, which is a source of confusion for many users.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: TWR CTLR CONCERNED WITH ASOS WX EQUIP PLACEMENT AT S END OF ARPT. RPTR CITES AS MUCH AS 50 DEG WIND DIFFERENCE FROM THE MID-FIELD SENSOR, AND A 2 MI PHYSICAL LOCATION DIFFERENCE. CTLR BELIEVES USERS MAY BE CONFUSED WHEN ACCESSING OBSERVATION INFO AND ASOS SHOULD BE CO-LOCATED WITH THE MID-FIELD EQUIP.

Narrative: ASOS INSTALLATION: WIND INST INSTALLED AT S END OF ARPT IN PARTIALLY SHELTERED LOCATION. DIFFERS BY 50 DEGS OR MORE DURING NW WINDS WHEN COMPARED TO MID-FIELD WIND SENSORS. ADDITIONALLY, THIS SENSOR IS APPROX 2 MI FROM THE APCH END OF RWY 19R/19L. I BELIEVE THIS INST DOES NOT GIVE A GOOD REPRESENTATION OF WIND CONDITIONS. TWR AND APCH HAVE DIRECT READING INSTS FROM THE MID-FIELD SENSOR, WHICH I BELIEVE IS THE BEST LOCATION. TWO ISSUES ARISE HERE: FIRST THE WX SVC INTENDS TO DECOMMISSION THE MID- FIELD SENSOR NOW THAT ASOS IS ON-LINE. SECOND, THE OFFICIAL WX OBSERVATION USES THE ASOS INST FOR THE WX SEQUENCE PRESENTLY, WHICH IS A SOURCE OF CONFUSION FOR MANY USERS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.