Narrative:

I had dropped off 2 passenger and attempted to restart the engines. They were hot and normal 'hot start' procedures did not work. I used power lever forward, mixture idle cut off and engine started in high RPM. Then got my IFR clearance from ground, cleared to taxi to runway 18. I was parked on ramp facing south and had to taxi south around a line of parked aircraft. When I got to the end of the line I continued south toward runway 36. Ground advised to taxi to runway 18, make 180 degrees. I did this and ground advised a cessna to give way to baron taxiing north and taxi to runway 18. I slowed down and when I saw that the cessna was stopping I continued for runway 18. I then became aware that perhaps I was taxiing too fast for the hump in the taxiway but not excessive for normal surface. As I was being cleared into position the tower controller asked name of pilot and where aircraft was based. I stated my last name and home base. The operator repeated the information incorrectly and I did not respond. The next day, I was visited by 2 FSDO inspectors and asked about those actions. They seemed to accept the explanation but was more concerned about the ownership of the aircraft and if it was, maybe a bootleg charter or pure part 91. Before the day was over I think we had the owner registration dilemma resolved. One of the inspectors made the statement 'that you had upset a lot of people there (springdale, ar).' who the people were or/and why upset I do not know. The flight was pure part 91 and I was PIC on pilot service basis for the company. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter states that the FSDO inspectors who were in the tower on that day had noted a name change and thought the flts in and out of springdale might be charter flts rather than cpr activity under part 91. The ownership had remained the same but the cpr name was changed. Reporter has heard nothing further from the FAA.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CPR PLT RPT REGARDING TAXI PROB ON DEP FROM ASG ARPT. TAXI TOWARD WRONG RWY. FSDO INSPECTORS QUESTIONED HIM THE NEXT DAY.

Narrative: I HAD DROPPED OFF 2 PAX AND ATTEMPTED TO RESTART THE ENGS. THEY WERE HOT AND NORMAL 'HOT START' PROCS DID NOT WORK. I USED PWR LEVER FORWARD, MIXTURE IDLE CUT OFF AND ENG STARTED IN HIGH RPM. THEN GOT MY IFR CLRNC FROM GND, CLRED TO TAXI TO RWY 18. I WAS PARKED ON RAMP FACING S AND HAD TO TAXI S AROUND A LINE OF PARKED ACFT. WHEN I GOT TO THE END OF THE LINE I CONTINUED S TOWARD RWY 36. GND ADVISED TO TAXI TO RWY 18, MAKE 180 DEGS. I DID THIS AND GND ADVISED A CESSNA TO GIVE WAY TO BARON TAXIING N AND TAXI TO RWY 18. I SLOWED DOWN AND WHEN I SAW THAT THE CESSNA WAS STOPPING I CONTINUED FOR RWY 18. I THEN BECAME AWARE THAT PERHAPS I WAS TAXIING TOO FAST FOR THE HUMP IN THE TXWY BUT NOT EXCESSIVE FOR NORMAL SURFACE. AS I WAS BEING CLRED INTO POS THE TWR CTLR ASKED NAME OF PLT AND WHERE ACFT WAS BASED. I STATED MY LAST NAME AND HOME BASE. THE OPERATOR REPEATED THE INFO INCORRECTLY AND I DID NOT RESPOND. THE NEXT DAY, I WAS VISITED BY 2 FSDO INSPECTORS AND ASKED ABOUT THOSE ACTIONS. THEY SEEMED TO ACCEPT THE EXPLANATION BUT WAS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE OWNERSHIP OF THE ACFT AND IF IT WAS, MAYBE A BOOTLEG CHARTER OR PURE PART 91. BEFORE THE DAY WAS OVER I THINK WE HAD THE OWNER REGISTRATION DILEMMA RESOLVED. ONE OF THE INSPECTORS MADE THE STATEMENT 'THAT YOU HAD UPSET A LOT OF PEOPLE THERE (SPRINGDALE, AR).' WHO THE PEOPLE WERE OR/AND WHY UPSET I DO NOT KNOW. THE FLT WAS PURE PART 91 AND I WAS PIC ON PLT SVC BASIS FOR THE COMPANY. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATES THAT THE FSDO INSPECTORS WHO WERE IN THE TWR ON THAT DAY HAD NOTED A NAME CHANGE AND THOUGHT THE FLTS IN AND OUT OF SPRINGDALE MIGHT BE CHARTER FLTS RATHER THAN CPR ACTIVITY UNDER PART 91. THE OWNERSHIP HAD REMAINED THE SAME BUT THE CPR NAME WAS CHANGED. RPTR HAS HEARD NOTHING FURTHER FROM THE FAA.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.