Narrative:

While flying the new departure out of newark (arthur kill 1 departure) we were asked by the controller if we were joining the sbj 100 degree radial. Our reply was 'no' and said we were on the 250 degree heading that the SID called for. At that point he cleared us direct to the sbj VOR. Looking closer at the SID, hidden in the text is the fact that 3 of the departure fixes, but not all, were to join the sbj 100 degree radial. There was no traffic conflict. The first officer and I had briefed the departure as part of our preflight and we both missed this very important part of the SID. I believe that the FAA and chart maker need to concentrate on more standardization in the presentation of these complicated sids and stars.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLC OF A B737-400 HAS PROB FLYING THE ARTHUR KILL 1 DEP FROM EWR. THERE IS CONFUSION OF JOINING THE 100 DEG RADIAL AFTER DEP. HDG DEV RESULTS.

Narrative: WHILE FLYING THE NEW DEP OUT OF NEWARK (ARTHUR KILL 1 DEP) WE WERE ASKED BY THE CTLR IF WE WERE JOINING THE SBJ 100 DEG RADIAL. OUR REPLY WAS 'NO' AND SAID WE WERE ON THE 250 DEG HDG THAT THE SID CALLED FOR. AT THAT POINT HE CLRED US DIRECT TO THE SBJ VOR. LOOKING CLOSER AT THE SID, HIDDEN IN THE TEXT IS THE FACT THAT 3 OF THE DEP FIXES, BUT NOT ALL, WERE TO JOIN THE SBJ 100 DEG RADIAL. THERE WAS NO TFC CONFLICT. THE FO AND I HAD BRIEFED THE DEP AS PART OF OUR PREFLT AND WE BOTH MISSED THIS VERY IMPORTANT PART OF THE SID. I BELIEVE THAT THE FAA AND CHART MAKER NEED TO CONCENTRATE ON MORE STANDARDIZATION IN THE PRESENTATION OF THESE COMPLICATED SIDS AND STARS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.