Narrative:

I may have inadvertently failed to properly secure a pylon access pane after a left engine change. Pilot reported a panel came off the left strut in-flight. Access panel appeared secured at the time of installation. The panel in question was not required to be removed for engine change per the job card. All pylon access panels were looked at and appeared secure. This type fastener, which are flush even when not locking panel to pylon, appeared tight and locked. The aircraft returned to pittsburgh and the missing panel was placed on confign deviation per procedures, and the aircraft was returned to service.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B737-300 HAD THE L ENG PYLON ACCESS PANEL DEPART THE ACFT INFLT DUE TO THE PANEL FASTENERS NOT SECURED.

Narrative: I MAY HAVE INADVERTENTLY FAILED TO PROPERLY SECURE A PYLON ACCESS PANE AFTER A L ENG CHANGE. PLT RPTED A PANEL CAME OFF THE L STRUT INFLT. ACCESS PANEL APPEARED SECURED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. THE PANEL IN QUESTION WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED FOR ENG CHANGE PER THE JOB CARD. ALL PYLON ACCESS PANELS WERE LOOKED AT AND APPEARED SECURE. THIS TYPE FASTENER, WHICH ARE FLUSH EVEN WHEN NOT LOCKING PANEL TO PYLON, APPEARED TIGHT AND LOCKED. THE ACFT RETURNED TO PITTSBURGH AND THE MISSING PANEL WAS PLACED ON CONFIGN DEV PER PROCS, AND THE ACFT WAS RETURNED TO SVC.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.