Narrative:

Our call sign AB10, cruising at FL290, anticipating climb. First officer handling radio. AB20 had taxied out in front of us at clt and flying same route towards west coast. We read back clearance for AB20 to climb to FL330 and ATC accepted our readback. We started climb, maximum altitude obtained was 29350 ft when ATC advised us to maintain FL290. We descended back to FL290. Familiarity with having heard our company's call sign since taxi from the gate, coupled with a simultaneous distraction from an FMC route irregularity contributed to us accepting the wrong clearance. Electronic data link messages for climb/descent clrncs would certainly help prevent this type of error.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737-300 ACFT. WHEN FLC READ BACK CLRNC THEY HAD READ BACK CLRNC FOR A SIMILAR CALL SIGN. ATC DIDN'T CATCH THE CALL SIGN ERROR EITHER. AS ACFT WAS CLBING THROUGH THE EXPECTED ALT, THE CTLR INTERVENED AND FLC LEVELED ACFT.

Narrative: OUR CALL SIGN AB10, CRUISING AT FL290, ANTICIPATING CLB. FO HANDLING RADIO. AB20 HAD TAXIED OUT IN FRONT OF US AT CLT AND FLYING SAME RTE TOWARDS WEST COAST. WE READ BACK CLRNC FOR AB20 TO CLB TO FL330 AND ATC ACCEPTED OUR READBACK. WE STARTED CLB, MAX ALT OBTAINED WAS 29350 FT WHEN ATC ADVISED US TO MAINTAIN FL290. WE DSNDED BACK TO FL290. FAMILIARITY WITH HAVING HEARD OUR COMPANY'S CALL SIGN SINCE TAXI FROM THE GATE, COUPLED WITH A SIMULTANEOUS DISTR FROM AN FMC RTE IRREGULARITY CONTRIBUTED TO US ACCEPTING THE WRONG CLRNC. ELECTRONIC DATA LINK MESSAGES FOR CLB/DSCNT CLRNCS WOULD CERTAINLY HELP PREVENT THIS TYPE OF ERROR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.