Narrative:

The first officer was flying the approach to bda. After lowering the gear, we noticed that the tailskid and gear amber lights were illuminated. The 3 green gear lights were also on. Our assumption was that the tailskid was not fully extended. The pilot's operating manual lists no special procedure for this condition, so the approach was continued. At approximately 500 ft altitude, the GPWS sounded a 'too low gear' warning. At that point, a missed approach was executed. On downwind leg, the gear was lowered with normal indications. An uneventful landing was completed. After discussing the incident with the company maintenance coordinator, he determined that the symptoms were indicative of the gear handle not being fully seated. After describing the various switches on the gear handle to me, I concurred with his reasoning. We also agreed that there was no need for a logbook entry since nothing was wrong with the aircraft. We departed bda on the last leg of the trip with no further problems. Since fos' must fly the aircraft, the landing gear control should be located so that neither pilot has to stretch over the pedestal in order to reach it.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B767'ER CREW GETS A TAILSKID AMBER LIGHT ON APCH TO BDA. BECAUSE TAILSKID IS NOT REQUIRED FOR LNDG, THE APCH WAS CONTINUED BUT GPWS GAVE A 'TOO LOW GEAR' WARNING AT ABOUT 500 FT. GAR INITIATED. UPON SECOND GEAR EXTENSION, GOT NORMAL GREEN LIGHTS. SUSPECT THE GEAR HANDLE WAS NOT PROPERLY SEATED IN ITS NOTCH THE FIRST TIME.

Narrative: THE FO WAS FLYING THE APCH TO BDA. AFTER LOWERING THE GEAR, WE NOTICED THAT THE TAILSKID AND GEAR AMBER LIGHTS WERE ILLUMINATED. THE 3 GREEN GEAR LIGHTS WERE ALSO ON. OUR ASSUMPTION WAS THAT THE TAILSKID WAS NOT FULLY EXTENDED. THE PLT'S OPERATING MANUAL LISTS NO SPECIAL PROC FOR THIS CONDITION, SO THE APCH WAS CONTINUED. AT APPROX 500 FT ALT, THE GPWS SOUNDED A 'TOO LOW GEAR' WARNING. AT THAT POINT, A MISSED APCH WAS EXECUTED. ON DOWNWIND LEG, THE GEAR WAS LOWERED WITH NORMAL INDICATIONS. AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG WAS COMPLETED. AFTER DISCUSSING THE INCIDENT WITH THE COMPANY MAINT COORDINATOR, HE DETERMINED THAT THE SYMPTOMS WERE INDICATIVE OF THE GEAR HANDLE NOT BEING FULLY SEATED. AFTER DESCRIBING THE VARIOUS SWITCHES ON THE GEAR HANDLE TO ME, I CONCURRED WITH HIS REASONING. WE ALSO AGREED THAT THERE WAS NO NEED FOR A LOGBOOK ENTRY SINCE NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE ACFT. WE DEPARTED BDA ON THE LAST LEG OF THE TRIP WITH NO FURTHER PROBS. SINCE FOS' MUST FLY THE ACFT, THE LNDG GEAR CTL SHOULD BE LOCATED SO THAT NEITHER PLT HAS TO STRETCH OVER THE PEDESTAL IN ORDER TO REACH IT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.