Narrative:

On initial contact with pit approach, they assigned us runway 32 with an ILS approach. However, while being vectored and subsequently cleared for the approach, our position just did not seem correct. We subsequently transitioned from IMC to VMC as the airport came into view. It was at this time it was evident the controller was vectoring us for runway 28R. We were then cleared for a visual approach to runway 28R.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A MD80 RECEIVES A VECTOR TO RWY 32, HOWEVER, DURING APCH ACFT DISCOVERS IT IS LINED UP FOR RWY 28R AT PIT.

Narrative: ON INITIAL CONTACT WITH PIT APCH, THEY ASSIGNED US RWY 32 WITH AN ILS APCH. HOWEVER, WHILE BEING VECTORED AND SUBSEQUENTLY CLRED FOR THE APCH, OUR POS JUST DID NOT SEEM CORRECT. WE SUBSEQUENTLY TRANSITIONED FROM IMC TO VMC AS THE ARPT CAME INTO VIEW. IT WAS AT THIS TIME IT WAS EVIDENT THE CTLR WAS VECTORING US FOR RWY 28R. WE WERE THEN CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 28R.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.