Narrative:

We had departed kimpo airport in seoul, korea, en route to taipei, taiwan. Approximately 30 mins into our flight, we were already level at our cruise altitude of FL260. We had a near miss with an airbus that passed underneath us about 500 ft or less. Center (taegu center) had called traffic out to us. Their exact words: 'traffic 12 O'clock (?) mi showing!! FL280.' (I do not remember the distance. However, it was a long distance, ie, greater than 10 mi.) I responded to center 'roger.' the next call from center was to ask us if we had the traffic in sight. I responded 'negative.' a few mins went by when we both (captain and I) jumped and saw an airbus at the bottom of our window, going beneath us, no time to react. Center called again, calling traffic (now behind us) 'traffic 4 O'clock showing!! FL280.' the controller hesitated in his speech while telling us this. We believe because he just saw on his radar screen what almost happened. However, he still called his altitude at FL280, saying he's 'showing!! FL280.' why? Maybe to cover up his mistake. We did not report it to center or complain to them. We asked for their phone number to call them on the ground, and were unable to reach them with the number they gave us. Contributing factor: we believe (but are not sure) that the previous controller must have given the airbus a discretionary descent. When he started down, the controller either did not notice his descent or misunderstood that we did not have him in sight. The airbus, either way, should not have been allowed to descend. Contributing factor: the altitude -- was the radar not working? Was the airbus mode C (altitude reporting) not working? Why did controller say 'showing FL280,' even after he passed below us. Contributing factor: no TCASII installed in cargo aircraft. FAA do not require united states cargo aircraft to install it. This would have been very helpful. Only for passenger aircraft. Why?

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NMAC BTWN A DC8 IN FOREIGN AIRSPACE SBOUND AT FL260 AND A DSNDING AIRBUS A310 DSNDING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION APPROX 500 FT BELOW. ATC RPTED THE TFC AT FL280, WHICH WOULD HAVE PLACED THE TFC AT 2000 FT ABOVE THEM!

Narrative: WE HAD DEPARTED KIMPO ARPT IN SEOUL, KOREA, ENRTE TO TAIPEI, TAIWAN. APPROX 30 MINS INTO OUR FLT, WE WERE ALREADY LEVEL AT OUR CRUISE ALT OF FL260. WE HAD A NEAR MISS WITH AN AIRBUS THAT PASSED UNDERNEATH US ABOUT 500 FT OR LESS. CTR (TAEGU CTR) HAD CALLED TFC OUT TO US. THEIR EXACT WORDS: 'TFC 12 O'CLOCK (?) MI SHOWING!! FL280.' (I DO NOT REMEMBER THE DISTANCE. HOWEVER, IT WAS A LONG DISTANCE, IE, GREATER THAN 10 MI.) I RESPONDED TO CTR 'ROGER.' THE NEXT CALL FROM CTR WAS TO ASK US IF WE HAD THE TFC IN SIGHT. I RESPONDED 'NEGATIVE.' A FEW MINS WENT BY WHEN WE BOTH (CAPT AND I) JUMPED AND SAW AN AIRBUS AT THE BOTTOM OF OUR WINDOW, GOING BENEATH US, NO TIME TO REACT. CTR CALLED AGAIN, CALLING TFC (NOW BEHIND US) 'TFC 4 O'CLOCK SHOWING!! FL280.' THE CTLR HESITATED IN HIS SPEECH WHILE TELLING US THIS. WE BELIEVE BECAUSE HE JUST SAW ON HIS RADAR SCREEN WHAT ALMOST HAPPENED. HOWEVER, HE STILL CALLED HIS ALT AT FL280, SAYING HE'S 'SHOWING!! FL280.' WHY? MAYBE TO COVER UP HIS MISTAKE. WE DID NOT RPT IT TO CTR OR COMPLAIN TO THEM. WE ASKED FOR THEIR PHONE NUMBER TO CALL THEM ON THE GND, AND WERE UNABLE TO REACH THEM WITH THE NUMBER THEY GAVE US. CONTRIBUTING FACTOR: WE BELIEVE (BUT ARE NOT SURE) THAT THE PREVIOUS CTLR MUST HAVE GIVEN THE AIRBUS A DISCRETIONARY DSCNT. WHEN HE STARTED DOWN, THE CTLR EITHER DID NOT NOTICE HIS DSCNT OR MISUNDERSTOOD THAT WE DID NOT HAVE HIM IN SIGHT. THE AIRBUS, EITHER WAY, SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO DSND. CONTRIBUTING FACTOR: THE ALT -- WAS THE RADAR NOT WORKING? WAS THE AIRBUS MODE C (ALT RPTING) NOT WORKING? WHY DID CTLR SAY 'SHOWING FL280,' EVEN AFTER HE PASSED BELOW US. CONTRIBUTING FACTOR: NO TCASII INSTALLED IN CARGO ACFT. FAA DO NOT REQUIRE UNITED STATES CARGO ACFT TO INSTALL IT. THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY HELPFUL. ONLY FOR PAX ACFT. WHY?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.