Narrative:

Flying with relatively new first officer, he was on company frequency approaching destination, lax. Center assigned 320 KTS when able, maintained speed and entered 12000 ft in altitude preselect, civet inbound. Lost track of altitude and descended below 12000 ft, 4 mi prematurely when switching from center to approach and accepting speed restr of 250 KTS at arnes. Don't know why altitude failed to capture and hold. Must have selected a different pitch command or rate on the flight guidance system. Have always considered the civet arrival challenging -- made more so by the speed assignments and traffic. Will now ensure that both pilots are 'in the loop' during this procedure. Thousand ft calls, flight monitoring, and ATC communication handled by the PNF would have probably prevented this altitude deviation.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: THE RPTR WAS FLYING WITH A RELATIVELY NEW FO WHO WAS ON THE COMPANY FREQ APCHING LAX. CTR ASSIGNED 320 KTS WHEN ABLE. MAINTAINED SPD AND ENTERED 12000 FT IN ALT PRESELECT. THE RPTR LOST TRACK OF ALT AND DSNDED BELOW 12000 FT 4 MI PREMATURELY WHEN SWITCHING FROM CTR TO APCH AND ACCEPTING SPD RESTR OF 250 KTS AT ARNES.

Narrative: FLYING WITH RELATIVELY NEW FO, HE WAS ON COMPANY FREQ APCHING DEST, LAX. CTR ASSIGNED 320 KTS WHEN ABLE, MAINTAINED SPD AND ENTERED 12000 FT IN ALT PRESELECT, CIVET INBOUND. LOST TRACK OF ALT AND DSNDED BELOW 12000 FT, 4 MI PREMATURELY WHEN SWITCHING FROM CTR TO APCH AND ACCEPTING SPD RESTR OF 250 KTS AT ARNES. DON'T KNOW WHY ALT FAILED TO CAPTURE AND HOLD. MUST HAVE SELECTED A DIFFERENT PITCH COMMAND OR RATE ON THE FLT GUIDANCE SYS. HAVE ALWAYS CONSIDERED THE CIVET ARR CHALLENGING -- MADE MORE SO BY THE SPD ASSIGNMENTS AND TFC. WILL NOW ENSURE THAT BOTH PLTS ARE 'IN THE LOOP' DURING THIS PROC. THOUSAND FT CALLS, FLT MONITORING, AND ATC COM HANDLED BY THE PNF WOULD HAVE PROBABLY PREVENTED THIS ALTDEV.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.